Friendlies·
Friendly International·06/06/2026·18:00
Brazil
Brazil
WWLDW
2-1
Finished
HT1-1
Egypt
Egypt
WDWDL
Neutral📍 Huntington Bank Field, Cleveland
Last 10Friendlies
Brazil10matchesEgypt10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
66%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

73%
1632
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1593
66%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

68%
65%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

77%
3.80
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.64

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
1.90
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.90
60%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

50%
10%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

40%
30%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

10%
40%
Clean Sheet50%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

60%
10%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

40%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
2.40
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.20
90%
Scored > 0.575%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

60%
80%
Over 1.560%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

40%
60%
Over 2.545%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

30%
40%
Over 3.530%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

20%
50%
BTTS40%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

30%
20%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

20%
40%
Scored Both Halves30%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

20%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.50
10.11
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.90
9/10
3.67
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.50
9/10
2.78
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.30
9/10
76%
Save %85%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

94%
9/10
40%
Clean Sheet50%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

60%

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1010
15.22
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.00
9/10
5.56
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.20
9/10
9.78
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

5.90
9/10
64%
Box Shot %62%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

59%
9/10
37%
On-Target %39%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

42%
9/10
15%
Shot Conversion14%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%
9/10

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1010
60%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

48%
9/10
88%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

82%
9/10
535.11
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

432.20
9/10
0.30
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.04

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
70%7/10
Leading at HT50%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

30%3/10
10%1/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

60%6/10
20%2/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

10%1/10
90%9/10
HT/FT Same Outcome80%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

70%7/10
86%6/7
Led at HT → Won93%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%3/3
0%0/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered50%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

100%1/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/1010/101010
12%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
8%
16-30'7%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

7%
32%
31-45'29%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

27%
16%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
8%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

20%
24%
76-90+'22%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

20%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/1010/101010
70%7/10
Scored First71%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

71%5/7
30%3/10
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

29%2/7
86%6/7
Win when Scoring First83%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

80%4/5
0%0/3
Win when Conceding First25%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

50%1/2
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

37'
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

49'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/1010/101010
50%5/10
Scored after 75'35%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

20%2/10
20%2/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

20%2/10
100%6/6
Lead Saved after 75'90%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%4/5
0%0/6
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%1/5
10%1/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

10%1/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/1010/101010
84%21/25
Open-Play Share85%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

87%13/15
12%3/25
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

7%1/15
4%1/25
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

7%1/15
11%1/9
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/4
0%0/9
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/4

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1010
4.89
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.10
9/10
3.44
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.60
9/10
59%
Corner Share47%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

36%
9/10
2.38
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.85
33%3/9
Match Corners > 8.547%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

60%6/10
9/10
22%2/9
Match Corners > 9.541%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

60%6/10
9/10
22%2/9
Match Corners > 10.531%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

40%4/10
9/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/1010/101010
1.44
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.90
9/10
0%0/9
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

20%2/10
9/10
13.00
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.00
9/10
44%4/9
Match Cards > 3.560%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

75%6/8
9/108/10
33%3/9
Match Cards > 4.535%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

38%3/8
9/108/10
53%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

48%