Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 26·03/06/2026·14:00
Laval
Laval
DLDDL
2-2
Finished
HT1-0
Guingamp
Guingamp
DDLDL
📍 Stade Francis Le Basser, Laval
Season statsLigue 2
Laval25matchesGuingamp25matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
40%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

49%
1491
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1506
43%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

53%
37%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

44%
2.43
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.77

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2525
0.76
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.40
12%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

36%
40%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

32%
48%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

32%
20%
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

32%
48%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

28%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2525
0.76
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.40
52%
Scored > 0.562%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

72%
68%
Over 1.570%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

72%
32%
Over 2.548%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

64%
16%
Over 3.526%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

36%
44%
BTTS48%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

52%
4%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

16%
12%
Scored Both Halves16%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

20%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2525
1.40
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.44
12.00
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.04
3.96
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.60
2.72
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.20
69%
Save %65%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

61%
20%
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

32%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2525
0.97
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.45
1.77
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.39
-0.80
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.06
-0.16
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.18
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2525
8.72
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.68
3.12
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.92
5.44
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.76
62%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

66%
36%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
9%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2525
47%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

55%
77%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

84%
400.16
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

483.36
-0.09
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.13

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2525
20%5/25
Leading at HT26%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

32%8/25
44%11/25
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

32%8/25
36%9/25
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

36%9/25
64%16/25
HT/FT Same Outcome66%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

68%17/25
60%3/5
Led at HT → Won68%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

75%6/8
22%2/9
Trailed at HT → Recovered22%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

22%2/9

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 25/2525/252525
5%
0-15'12%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

19%
24%
16-30'23%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

22%
33%
31-45'22%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

11%
24%
46-60'19%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

14%
5%
61-75'9%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

14%
10%
76-90+'16%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 25/2525/252525
45%10/22
Scored First52%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

59%13/22
55%12/22
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

41%9/22
30%3/10
Win when Scoring First46%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

62%8/13
0%0/12
Win when Conceding First6%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

11%1/9
31'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

24'
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

24'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 25/2525/252525
8%2/25
Scored after 75'16%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

24%6/25
28%7/25
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

28%7/25
50%3/6
Lead Saved after 75'66%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

82%9/11
50%3/6
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

18%2/11
0%0/25
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/25

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 25/2525/252525
67%14/21
Open-Play Share81%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

95%35/37
19%4/21
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

3%1/37
14%3/21
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/37
9%3/33
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%4/36
3%1/33
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/36

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2525
4.68
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.36
5.76
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.76
45%
Corner Share52%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

59%
-1.87
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.70
76%19/25
Match Corners > 8.566%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

56%14/25
60%15/25
Match Corners > 9.546%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

32%8/25
48%12/25
Match Corners > 10.538%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

28%7/25

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 25/2525/252525
2.08
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.88
12%3/25
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

12%3/25
14.76
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.64
76%16/21
Match Cards > 3.579%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

82%18/22
21/2522/25
48%10/21
Match Cards > 4.556%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

64%14/22
21/2522/25
64%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

69%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeLaval at home · Guingamp on the road
1212
0.42
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.33
0%0/12
Win Rate17%

Share of sampled matches won.

33%4/12
58%7/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%4/12
0.67
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.50
1.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.50
8%1/12
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%3/12
42%5/12
BTTS54%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%8/12
33%4/12
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%8/12
1.01
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.67
1.73
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.68