Czech Liga·
Regular Season - 24·03/01/2026·09:30
Zlin
Zlin
DDLLL
3-0
Finished
HT1-0
Plzen
Plzen
DDDWW
📍 Stadion Letna, Zlin
Season statsCzech Liga
Zlin23matchesPlzen23matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Czech Liga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
43%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

66%
1546
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1766
45%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

73%
41%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

59%
1.78
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.56

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2323
1.22
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.83
30%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

52%
30%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

26%
39%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

22%
30%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%
35%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

17%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2323
1.13
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.83
65%
Scored > 0.574%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

83%
65%
Over 1.574%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

83%
43%
Over 2.548%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

52%
35%
Over 3.530%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

26%
48%
BTTS52%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

57%
13%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

26%
9%
Scored Both Halves26%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

43%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2323
1.26
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.22
12.65
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.57
4.52
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.35
3.22
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.22
71%
Save %73%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

74%
30%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2323
1.34
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.45
1.82
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.44
-0.48
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.02
-0.30
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.07
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.10

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2323
10.61
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

15.78
2.91
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.61
6.35
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.78
60%
Box Shot %61%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

62%
27%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

36%
11%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2323
40%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

55%
68%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

77%
264.52
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

385.22
-0.20
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.03

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2323
30%7/23
Leading at HT43%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

57%13/23
39%9/23
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

22%5/23
30%7/23
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

22%5/23
70%16/23
HT/FT Same Outcome72%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

74%17/23
86%6/7
Led at HT → Won81%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

77%10/13
29%2/7
Trailed at HT → Recovered24%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

20%1/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 23/2323/232323
15%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

12%
15%
16-30'18%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

21%
23%
31-45'22%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
15%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

16%
27%
61-75'20%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

14%
4%
76-90+'10%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

16%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 23/2323/232323
40%8/20
Scored First56%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

73%16/22
60%12/20
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

27%6/22
63%5/8
Win when Scoring First66%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

69%11/16
17%2/12
Win when Conceding First17%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

17%1/6
22'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
38'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

28'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 23/2323/232323
9%2/23
Scored after 75'17%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

26%6/23
17%4/23
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

26%6/23
75%6/8
Lead Saved after 75'79%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

83%10/12
25%2/8
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

17%2/12
0%0/23
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/23

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 23/2323/232323
85%22/26
Open-Play Share90%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

95%41/43
12%3/26
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

2%1/43
4%1/26
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

2%1/43
7%2/29
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%3/27
3%1/29
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/27

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2323
3.87
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.65
5.65
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.78
41%
Corner Share50%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

60%
-1.78
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.80
52%12/23
Match Corners > 8.554%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

57%13/23
48%11/23
Match Corners > 9.546%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

43%10/23
26%6/23
Match Corners > 10.530%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

35%8/23

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 23/2323/232323
2.17
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.26
4%1/23
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

4%1/23
14.26
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.70
67%14/21
Match Cards > 3.578%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

89%17/19
21/2319/23
43%9/21
Match Cards > 4.558%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

74%14/19
21/2319/23
64%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

58%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeZlin at home · Plzen on the road
1111
1.18
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.82
27%3/11
Win Rate41%

Share of sampled matches won.

55%6/11
36%4/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

27%3/11
1.45
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.00
1.45
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.27
18%2/11
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%3/11
64%7/11
BTTS59%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

55%6/11
55%6/11
Over 2.559%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

64%7/11
1.65
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.52
2.19
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.53