Jupiler Pro League·
Regular Season - 27·03/01/2026·07:30
Genk
Genk
LLWWW
3-0
Finished
HT1-0
Gent
Gent
LWLDW
📍 Cegeka Arena, Genk
Season statsJupiler Pro League
Genk26matchesGent26matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Jupiler Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
55%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

52%
1722
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1587
60%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

56%
49%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

48%
3.35
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.33

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2626
1.35
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.38
35%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

38%
31%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

23%
35%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

38%
8%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%
15%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

19%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2626
1.38
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.58
85%
Scored > 0.583%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

81%
88%
Over 1.587%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

85%
62%
Over 2.560%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

58%
19%
Over 3.529%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

38%
77%
BTTS69%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

62%
27%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

19%
23%
Scored Both Halves27%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

31%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2626
1.54
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.46
12.92
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.62
4.77
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.92
3.23
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.42
68%
Save %69%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
8%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2626
1.71
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.53
1.38
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.60
0.33
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.08
-0.13
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.06
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2626
15.92
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.35
5.88
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.46
9.73
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.73
61%
Box Shot %63%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

65%
37%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

33%
9%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2626
62%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

51%
86%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

81%
556.42
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

440.27
0.13
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.02

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2626
23%6/26
Leading at HT25%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

27%7/26
42%11/26
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

35%9/26
35%9/26
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

38%10/26
58%15/26
HT/FT Same Outcome58%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

58%15/26
50%3/6
Led at HT → Won61%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

71%5/7
22%2/9
Trailed at HT → Recovered26%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

30%3/10

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 26/2626/262626
22%
0-15'18%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

14%
19%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

12%
8%
31-45'10%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

12%
16%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

16%
14%
61-75'11%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

9%
22%
76-90+'29%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

37%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 26/2626/262626
46%12/26
Scored First47%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

48%12/25
54%14/26
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

52%13/25
50%6/12
Win when Scoring First58%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

67%8/12
21%3/14
Win when Conceding First18%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

15%2/13
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

27'
21'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

30'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 26/2626/262626
31%8/26
Scored after 75'37%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

42%11/26
27%7/26
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

31%8/26
70%7/10
Lead Saved after 75'75%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%8/10
30%3/10
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%2/10
12%3/26
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/26

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 26/2626/262626
95%35/37
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

88%38/43
3%1/37
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

9%4/43
3%1/37
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

2%1/43
8%3/39
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

5%2/37
0%0/39
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/37

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2626
5.65
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.81
4.19
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.73
57%
Corner Share52%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

46%
0.63
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.72
65%17/26
Match Corners > 8.565%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

65%17/26
50%13/26
Match Corners > 9.554%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

58%15/26
42%11/26
Match Corners > 10.548%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

54%14/26

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 26/2626/262626
1.38
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.62
4%1/26
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

15%4/26
10.15
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.69
84%16/19
Match Cards > 3.578%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

73%16/22
19/2622/26
63%12/19
Match Cards > 4.559%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

55%12/22
19/2622/26
66%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

71%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGenk at home · Gent on the road
1313
1.23
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.23
31%4/13
Win Rate31%

Share of sampled matches won.

31%4/13
38%5/13
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

38%5/13
1.31
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.46
1.54
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.69
8%1/13
Clean Sheet12%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

15%2/13
69%9/13
BTTS69%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

69%9/13
46%6/13
Over 2.554%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

62%8/13
1.84
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.45
1.00
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.68