1. Division·
Regular Season - 19·08/16/2025·12:00
Lillestrom
Lillestrom
WWWWW
3-0
Finished
HT0-0
Start
Start
WWWWL
📍 Åråsen Stadion, Kjeller
Season stats1. Division
Lillestrom18matchesStart18matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in 1. Division.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
90%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

79%
1692
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1614
84%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

73%
95%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

85%
3.07
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.91

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1818
2.44
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.06
72%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

61%
28%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

22%
0%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

17%
61%
Clean Sheet50%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

39%
6%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

11%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1818
2.33
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.06
94%
Scored > 0.592%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

89%
78%
Over 1.583%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

89%
61%
Over 2.564%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%
33%
Over 3.533%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

33%
39%
BTTS47%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%
17%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

28%
44%
Scored Both Halves42%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

39%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1818
0.56
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
61%
Clean Sheet50%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

39%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1818
2.81
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.58
0.82
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.16
1.90
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.42
-0.59
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.45
0.26
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1818
-0.03
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1818
61%11/18
Leading at HT50%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

39%7/18
33%6/18
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

39%7/18
6%1/18
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

22%4/18
67%12/18
HT/FT Same Outcome53%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

39%7/18
82%9/11
Led at HT → Won69%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

57%4/7
100%1/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered75%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%2/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 18/1818/181818
11%
0-15'12%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
11%
16-30'8%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

5%
34%
31-45'25%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

16%
14%
46-60'23%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

32%
7%
61-75'11%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

16%
23%
76-90+'21%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

18%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 18/1818/181818
82%14/17
Scored First74%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

65%11/17
18%3/17
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

35%6/17
93%13/14
Win when Scoring First83%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

73%8/11
0%0/3
Win when Conceding First25%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

50%3/6
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

30'
18'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

23'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 18/1818/181818
44%8/18
Scored after 75'42%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

39%7/18
6%1/18
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

17%3/18
85%11/13
Lead Saved after 75'87%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

90%9/10
15%2/13
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

10%1/10
0%0/18
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

6%1/18

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 18/1818/181818
93%41/44
Open-Play Share93%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%35/38
2%1/44
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%3/38
5%2/44
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/38
20%2/10
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%2/19
0%0/10
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/19

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1818
-0.02
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 18/1818/181818
60%9/15
Match Cards > 3.561%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

63%10/16
15/1816/18
40%6/15
Match Cards > 4.536%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

31%5/16
15/1816/18
71%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

72%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeLillestrom at home · Start on the road
89
2.50
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.33
75%6/8
Win Rate71%

Share of sampled matches won.

67%6/9
0%0/8
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%0/9
2.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.00
0.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.67
63%5/8
Clean Sheet59%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

56%5/9
38%3/8
BTTS41%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

44%4/9
50%4/8
Over 2.553%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

56%5/9
2.34
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.57
0.80
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.17