A-League·
Regular Season - 21·03/01/2025·03:35
Macarthur
Macarthur
LDLWL
0-2
Finished
HT0-0
Sydney
Sydney
DDDDW
📍 Campbelltown Sports Stadium, Sydney
Season statsA-League
Macarthur18matchesSydney18matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in A-League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
46%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

53%
1401
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1458
55%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

55%
37%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

51%
3.16
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.43

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1818
1.39
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.44
39%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

39%
22%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

28%
39%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%
17%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%
11%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

22%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1818
1.83
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.17
89%
Scored > 0.583%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

78%
83%
Over 1.583%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

83%
78%
Over 2.578%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

78%
28%
Over 3.539%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

50%
78%
BTTS72%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%
28%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

28%
33%
Scored Both Halves42%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

50%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1818
1.44
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.67
14.67
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.83
4.61
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.44
3.28
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.61
71%
Save %65%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

59%
17%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1818
1.95
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.52
1.77
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.89
0.18
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.63
-0.31
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.39
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.15

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1818
14.44
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

16.94
5.33
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

6.22
10.44
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

10.83
72%
Box Shot %68%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

64%
37%
On-Target %37%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

37%
13%
Shot Conversion13%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1818
51%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

59%
82%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

85%
463.22
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

526.83
-0.02
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.21

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1818
33%6/18
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

22%4/18
50%9/18
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

50%9/18
17%3/18
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

28%5/18
28%5/18
HT/FT Same Outcome33%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

39%7/18
50%3/6
Led at HT → Won63%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

75%3/4
67%2/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered63%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

60%3/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 18/1817/181818
15%
0-15'11%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

8%
24%
16-30'16%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

8%
15%
31-45'15%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

16%
9%
46-60'11%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
18%
61-75'18%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

18%
21%
76-90+'29%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

37%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 18/1817/181818
65%11/17
Scored First62%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

60%9/15
35%6/17
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

40%6/15
55%6/11
Win when Scoring First66%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

78%7/9
17%1/6
Win when Conceding First8%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/6
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

28'
24'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

43'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 18/1817/181818
33%6/18
Scored after 75'46%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

59%10/17
28%5/18
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

35%6/17
86%6/7
Lead Saved after 75'93%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%7/7
14%1/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/7
22%4/18
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

29%5/17

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 18/1817/181818
94%32/34
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

89%34/38
0%0/34
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

5%2/38
6%2/34
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

5%2/38
12%3/25
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/24
4%1/25
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/24

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1818
5.89
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.72
5.00
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.00
54%
Corner Share54%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

53%
0.52
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.83
78%14/18
Match Corners > 8.575%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

72%13/18
72%13/18
Match Corners > 9.567%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

61%11/18
67%12/18
Match Corners > 10.561%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

56%10/18

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 18/1817/181818
1.78
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.00
6%1/18
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

17%3/18
9.06
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.44
60%9/15
Match Cards > 3.571%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

81%13/16
15/1816/18
40%6/15
Match Cards > 4.545%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

50%8/16
15/1816/18
74%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

58%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeMacarthur at home · Sydney on the road
99
1.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.11
22%2/9
Win Rate22%

Share of sampled matches won.

22%2/9
44%4/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%3/9
1.89
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.22
1.67
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.44
11%1/9
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%2/9
78%7/9
BTTS67%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%5/9
67%6/9
Over 2.561%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

56%5/9
1.90
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.65
1.93
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.74