J1 League·
Final·06/06/2026·05:00 AM
Kashima
Kashima
LWWDW
2-0
Finished
HT0-0
Vissel Kobe
Vissel Kobe
WWDWL
📍 Mercari Stadium, Kashima
Season statsJ1 League
Kashima19matchesKobe19matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in J1 League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
66%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

69%
1727
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1625
69%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

60%
62%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

78%
2.32
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.90

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1919
2.26
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.89
68%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

53%
21%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

32%
11%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

16%
58%
Clean Sheet47%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

37%
5%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

21%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1919
1.53
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.68
95%
Scored > 0.587%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

79%
74%
Over 1.576%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

79%
32%
Over 2.542%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

53%
11%
Over 3.521%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

32%
37%
BTTS42%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

47%
11%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

21%
26%
Scored Both Halves29%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

32%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1919
0.74
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.11
12.37
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.95
3.32
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.21
2.47
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.95
75%
Save %72%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
58%
Clean Sheet47%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

37%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1919
1.44
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.49
1.03
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.30
0.41
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.19
-0.00
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.16
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1919
11.84
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.63
3.89
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.11
7.58
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.26
64%
Box Shot %66%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

68%
33%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

30%
13%
Shot Conversion13%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1919
57%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

54%
83%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

74%
502.05
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

426.37
0.15
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.09

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1919
32%6/19
Leading at HT34%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

37%7/19
47%9/19
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

42%8/19
21%4/19
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

21%4/19
58%11/19
HT/FT Same Outcome58%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

58%11/19
100%6/6
Led at HT → Won93%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

86%6/7
50%2/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered50%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%2/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 19/1919/191919
7%
0-15'7%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

7%
7%
16-30'12%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

17%
24%
31-45'20%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

17%
17%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
7%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

20%
38%
76-90+'32%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

27%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 19/1919/191919
74%14/19
Scored First62%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

50%9/18
26%5/19
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

50%9/18
86%12/14
Win when Scoring First82%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

78%7/9
20%1/5
Win when Conceding First27%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

33%3/9
47'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

35'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 19/1919/191919
58%11/19
Scored after 75'45%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

32%6/19
5%1/19
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

26%5/19
100%7/7
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%6/6
0%0/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/6
0%0/19
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/19

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 19/1919/191919
86%25/29
Open-Play Share85%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

83%25/30
14%4/29
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

17%5/30
0%0/29
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/30
7%1/14
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

4%1/23
0%0/14
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

9%2/23

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1919
4.79
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.95
5.68
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.47
46%
Corner Share49%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

53%
-1.12
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.71
74%14/19
Match Corners > 8.568%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

63%12/19
68%13/19
Match Corners > 9.555%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

42%8/19
47%9/19
Match Corners > 10.537%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

26%5/19

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 19/1919/191919
0.89
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.16
16%3/19
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

5%1/19
9.68
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

8.11
50%6/12
Match Cards > 3.545%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

40%6/15
12/1915/19
17%2/12
Match Cards > 4.518%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

20%3/15
12/1915/19
68%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

63%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeKashima at home · Kobe on the road
99
2.78
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.44
89%8/9
Win Rate61%

Share of sampled matches won.

33%3/9
0%0/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

22%2/9
1.56
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.44
0.22
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.33
78%7/9
Clean Sheet50%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%2/9
22%2/9
BTTS39%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%5/9
22%2/9
Over 2.533%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

44%4/9
1.44
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.26
0.82
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.84