Championnat D1·
Regular Season - 21·06/10/2026·02:30 PM
Oyem AC
Oyem AC
LWLLD
1-2
Finished
HT1-1
Bitam
Bitam
LWDLD
Season statsChampionnat D1
AC10matchesBitam16matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Championnat D1.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
39%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

49%
1250
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1229
42%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

43%
36%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

55%
2.33
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.66

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1016
0.90
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.06
20%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

31%
30%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

13%
50%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

56%
30%
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%
60%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

38%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1016
1.10
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.13
40%
Scored > 0.551%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

63%
50%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

94%
30%
Over 2.546%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

63%
20%
Over 3.529%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

38%
30%
BTTS40%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%
10%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

19%
22%
Scored Both Halves28%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

33%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1016
1.10
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.13
30%
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1016
22%2/9
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

33%4/12
44%4/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

33%4/12
33%3/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%4/12
78%7/9
HT/FT Same Outcome72%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

67%8/12
100%2/2
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%4/4
0%0/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered13%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

25%1/4

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeAC at home · Bitam on the road
58
1.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.50
20%1/5
Win Rate35%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%4/8
40%2/5
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%4/8
0.60
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.25
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.88
20%1/5
Clean Sheet16%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%1/8
40%2/5
BTTS45%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%4/8
20%1/5
Over 2.548%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%6/8