Derde Divisie - Relegation Round·
Final·06/03/2026·06:00 PM
NEO
NEO
WW
1-0
Finished
HT1-0
TEC
TEC
WDDWD

Stats below use each team's main league —Derde Divisie - SaturdayNetherlands

Last 10Derde Divisie - Relegation Round
NEO2matchesTEC10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
95%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

63%
1250
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1302
95%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

54%
95%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

72%
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.64

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
210
3.00
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.60
100%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

40%
0%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

40%
0%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%
50%
Clean Sheet50%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%
0%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

20%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
210
3.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.30
100%
Scored > 0.590%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

80%
100%
Over 1.585%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

70%
100%
Over 2.565%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

30%
50%
Over 3.535%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

20%
50%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%
50%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

10%
100%
Scored Both Halves65%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

30%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
210
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
50%
Clean Sheet50%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
210
100%2/2
Leading at HT75%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

50%5/10
0%0/2
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

40%4/10
0%0/2
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

10%1/10
100%2/2
HT/FT Same Outcome85%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

70%7/10
100%2/2
Led at HT → Won90%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

80%4/5
0/0
Trailed at HT → Recovered

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

100%1/1

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeNEO at home · TEC on the road
15
3.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.00
100%1/1
Win Rate80%

Share of sampled matches won.

60%3/5
0%0/1
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%1/5
3.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.60
0.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.20
100%1/1
Clean Sheet80%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

60%3/5
0%0/1
BTTS20%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%2/5
100%1/1
Over 2.570%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

40%2/5