Segunda División·
2nd Phase - 1·05/10/2026·12:45 PM
Miramar
Miramar
DDLWL
1-1
Finished
HT0-1
CA River Plate
CA River Plate
WLLLD
📍 Parque Palermo, Montevideo

Stats below use each team's main league —Primera División - ClausuraUruguay

Last 10Segunda División
Miramar10matchesPlate10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
45%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

35%
1322
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1270
50%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

40%
40%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

30%
1.97
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.98

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
1.40
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.20
40%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

30%
20%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

30%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%
30%
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%
30%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

20%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
1.30
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.30
70%
Scored > 0.575%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

80%
80%
Over 1.580%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

80%
50%
Over 2.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%
10%
Over 3.520%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

30%
50%
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%
20%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

10%
30%
Scored Both Halves25%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

20%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.10
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.50
30%
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
0.65
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.29
1.31
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

2.57
-0.67
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-1.28
-0.12
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.23

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
30%3/10
Leading at HT30%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

30%3/10
60%6/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

40%4/10
10%1/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

30%3/10
60%6/10
HT/FT Same Outcome65%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

70%7/10
100%3/3
Led at HT → Won83%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

67%2/3
0%0/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/1010/101010
15%
0-15'23%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

31%
8%
16-30'4%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

0%
23%
31-45'23%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

23%
23%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

8%
15%
61-75'15%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

15%
15%
76-90+'19%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

23%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/1010/101010
33%3/9
Scored First47%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

60%6/10
67%6/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

40%4/10
100%3/3
Win when Scoring First75%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

50%3/6
17%1/6
Win when Conceding First8%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/4
12'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

23'
42'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

24'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/1010/101010
22%2/9
Scored after 75'26%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

30%3/10
11%1/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

30%3/10
100%4/4
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%3/3
0%0/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/3
11%1/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

10%1/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/1010/101010
92%12/13
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%12/13
8%1/13
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%1/13
0%0/13
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/13
9%1/11
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%1/15
0%0/11
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/15

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/1010/101010
100%1/1
Match Cards > 3.5100%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%4/4
1/104/10
0%0/1
Match Cards > 4.550%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

100%4/4
1/104/10
33%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

68%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeMiramar at home · Plate on the road
55
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.20
60%3/5
Win Rate50%

Share of sampled matches won.

40%2/5
20%1/5
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

60%3/5
1.20
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.40
0.60
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.60
60%3/5
Clean Sheet50%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%2/5
20%1/5
BTTS20%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

20%1/5
40%2/5
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

60%3/5
0.40
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.88
0.72
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

3.24