Cup·
Final·05/29/2026·04:00 PM
Apollon Limassol
Apollon Limassol
LWWLW
0-2
Finished
HT0-0
Pafos
Pafos
WDWLL
Neutral📍 GSP Stadium, Nicosia

Stats below use each team's main league —1. DivisionCyprus

Last 10Cup
Limassol10matchesPafos10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
57%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

68%
1561
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1678
57%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

65%
58%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

70%
3.57
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.87

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
1.60
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.60
50%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

40%
10%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

40%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%
20%
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%
30%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

10%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
1.80
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.70
70%
Scored > 0.580%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

90%
80%
Over 1.590%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

100%
70%
Over 2.560%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%
50%
Over 3.540%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

30%
60%
BTTS65%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

70%
40%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

20%
50%
Scored Both Halves45%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

40%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.90
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.30
11.00
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

1/100/10
4.00
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

1/100/10
2.00
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

1/100/10
50%
Save %

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

1/100/10
20%
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.75
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.13
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.62
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.04
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1010
15.00
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

1/100/10
4.00
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

1/100/10
7.00
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

1/100/10
47%
Box Shot %

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

1/100/10
27%
On-Target %

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

1/100/10
20%
Shot Conversion

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

1/100/10

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1010
46%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

1/100/10
76%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

1/100/10
328.00
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

1/100/10
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.02

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
50%5/10
Leading at HT45%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

40%4/10
20%2/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

30%3/10
30%3/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

30%3/10
90%9/10
HT/FT Same Outcome70%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

50%5/10
100%5/5
Led at HT → Won88%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

75%3/4
0%0/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered33%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

67%2/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/1010/101010
19%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

11%
6%
16-30'17%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

28%
38%
31-45'30%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

22%
6%
46-60'9%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

11%
19%
61-75'9%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

0%
13%
76-90+'20%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

28%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/1010/101010
44%4/9
Scored First47%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

50%5/10
56%5/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

50%5/10
75%3/4
Win when Scoring First68%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

60%3/5
40%2/5
Win when Conceding First30%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

20%1/5
15'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

17'
8'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

33'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/1010/101010
20%2/10
Scored after 75'30%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

40%4/10
30%3/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

30%3/10
100%3/3
Lead Saved after 75'83%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

67%4/6
0%0/3
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

33%2/6
0%0/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/1010/101010
94%15/16
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

89%16/18
6%1/16
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

6%1/18
0%0/16
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

6%1/18
0%0/21
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

8%1/12
10%2/21
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/12

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1010
6.00
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

1/100/10
8.00
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

1/100/10
43%
Corner Share

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

1/100/10
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.99
100%1/1
Match Corners > 8.5

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

0/0
1/100/10
100%1/1
Match Corners > 9.5

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

0/0
1/100/10
100%1/1
Match Corners > 10.5

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

0/0
1/100/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/1010/101010
2.00
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1/100/10
0%0/1
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0/0
1/100/10
11.00
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

1/100/10
80%8/10
Match Cards > 3.580%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

80%8/10
50%5/10
Match Cards > 4.555%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

60%6/10
85%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

66%