Czech Liga·
Championship Group - 2·05/09/2026·10:00
Plzen
Plzen
WWLDD
2-0
Finished
HT1-0
Slovan Liberec
Slovan Liberec
LWDLW
📍 Doosan Arena, Plzen
Season statsCzech Liga
Plzen31matchesLiberec31matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Czech Liga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
65%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

51%
1719
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1577
62%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

51%
68%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

50%
2.14
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.16

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3131
1.81
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.48
52%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

39%
26%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

32%
23%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

29%
35%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

35%
23%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

26%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3131
1.71
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.42
77%
Scored > 0.576%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

74%
77%
Over 1.576%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

74%
52%
Over 2.547%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

42%
26%
Over 3.524%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

23%
48%
BTTS48%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

48%
23%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

13%
42%
Scored Both Halves37%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

32%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3131
1.13
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.03
11.23
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.00
4.13
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.65
3.06
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.58
74%
Save %73%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

71%
35%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

35%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3131
1.79
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.37
1.32
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.07
0.47
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.30
-0.21
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.12
0.10
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.10

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3131
16.65
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.39
5.90
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.68
10.00
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.29
60%
Box Shot %57%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

54%
35%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
10%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

11%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3131
56%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

48%
79%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

73%
400.74
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

311.29
0.14
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.04

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3131
52%16/31
Leading at HT39%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

26%8/31
29%9/31
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

48%15/31
19%6/31
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

26%8/31
74%23/31
HT/FT Same Outcome68%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

61%19/31
81%13/16
Led at HT → Won84%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

88%7/8
17%1/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered27%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

38%3/8

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 31/3131/313131
11%
0-15'10%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

9%
17%
16-30'16%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

16%
22%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

16%
17%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

16%
15%
61-75'15%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

16%
19%
76-90+'23%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

27%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 31/3131/313131
69%20/29
Scored First58%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

46%13/28
31%9/29
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

54%15/28
70%14/20
Win when Scoring First73%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

77%10/13
22%2/9
Win when Conceding First18%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

13%2/15
31'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

31'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

35'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 31/3131/313131
26%8/31
Scored after 75'31%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

35%11/31
26%8/31
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

16%5/31
88%14/16
Lead Saved after 75'84%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%8/10
13%2/16
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%2/10
0%0/31
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/31

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 31/3131/313131
93%50/54
Open-Play Share93%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

93%41/44
6%3/54
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

5%2/44
2%1/54
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

2%1/44
9%3/34
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

13%4/32
0%0/34
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/32

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3131
5.90
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.84
3.81
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.87
61%
Corner Share55%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

50%
2.40
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.30
61%19/31
Match Corners > 8.560%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

58%18/31
52%16/31
Match Corners > 9.547%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

42%13/31
42%13/31
Match Corners > 10.535%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

29%9/31

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 31/3131/313131
1.87
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.55
6%2/31
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

16%5/31
11.97
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

15.68
87%20/23
Match Cards > 3.585%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

83%24/29
23/3129/31
70%16/23
Match Cards > 4.571%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

72%21/29
23/3129/31
63%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

56%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgePlzen at home · Liberec on the road
1615
1.81
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.33
50%8/16
Win Rate42%

Share of sampled matches won.

33%5/15
19%3/16
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%5/15
1.69
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.60
1.13
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.33
31%5/16
Clean Sheet29%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%4/15
56%9/16
BTTS58%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%9/15
44%7/16
Over 2.552%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

60%9/15
2.27
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.76
1.24
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.54