Coppa Italia·
Final·05/13/2026·15:00
Lazio
Lazio
LWDDW
0-2
Finished
HT0-2
Inter
Inter
WWDWW
📍 Stadio Olimpico, Rome

Stats below use each team's main league —Serie AItaly

Last 10Coppa Italia
Lazio10matchesInter10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
56%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

83%
1645
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1944
61%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

76%
50%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

89%
2.82
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.57

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
1.80
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.10
50%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

60%
30%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

30%
20%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

10%
30%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%
20%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

10%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
1.40
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.40
80%
Scored > 0.585%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

90%
80%
Over 1.585%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

90%
40%
Over 2.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

60%
10%
Over 3.525%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

40%
50%
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%
20%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

30%
20%
Scored Both Halves35%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

50%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.10
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.20
13.80
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.90
4.00
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.70
2.80
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.60
70%
Save %70%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
30%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
1.37
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.94
1.23
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.26
0.14
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.68
-0.19
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.33
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1010
10.10
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

14.30
4.20
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.10
6.40
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

10.10
63%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

71%
42%
On-Target %39%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

36%
14%
Shot Conversion15%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

17%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1010
48%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

57%
87%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

89%
499.20
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

563.00
-0.02
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.17

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
20%2/10
Leading at HT40%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

60%6/10
30%3/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

10%1/10
50%5/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

30%3/10
50%5/10
HT/FT Same Outcome45%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

40%4/10
100%2/2
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%3/6
60%3/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered63%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

67%2/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/1010/101010
14%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
7%
16-30'8%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

8%
0%
31-45'8%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

17%
21%
46-60'23%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

25%
7%
61-75'12%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

17%
50%
76-90+'35%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

21%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/1010/101010
50%5/10
Scored First60%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

70%7/10
50%5/10
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

30%3/10
80%4/5
Win when Scoring First69%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

57%4/7
20%1/5
Win when Conceding First43%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

67%2/3
38'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

22'
19'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

34'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/1010/101010
60%6/10
Scored after 75'50%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

40%4/10
30%3/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

40%4/10
100%3/3
Lead Saved after 75'81%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

63%5/8
0%0/3
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

38%3/8
0%0/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/1010/101010
100%14/14
Open-Play Share100%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

100%24/24
0%0/14
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/24
0%0/14
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/24
0%0/11
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

17%2/12
0%0/11
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/12

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1010
3.40
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.80
5.20
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.10
40%
Corner Share47%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

54%
-0.74
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.73
60%6/10
Match Corners > 8.555%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

50%5/10
40%4/10
Match Corners > 9.545%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

50%5/10
30%3/10
Match Corners > 10.535%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

40%4/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/1010/101010
2.00
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.80
10%1/10
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/10
10.30
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.00
67%6/9
Match Cards > 3.562%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

57%4/7
9/107/10
33%3/9
Match Cards > 4.545%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

57%4/7
9/107/10
74%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

81%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeLazio at home · Inter on the road
55
1.60
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.60
40%2/5
Win Rate40%

Share of sampled matches won.

40%2/5
20%1/5
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%1/5
1.40
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.00
1.60
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.40
20%1/5
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%1/5
60%3/5
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%3/5
60%3/5
Over 2.560%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

60%3/5
1.46
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.51
1.47
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.28