Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 30·05/09/2026·03:00 PM
CA Batna
CA Batna
LDWLW
2-0
Finished
HT2-0
USM Annaba
USM Annaba
LLDDW
📍 Stade Seffouhi, Batna
Season statsLigue 2
Batna29matchesAnnaba29matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
56%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

45%
1348
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1325
63%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

57%
48%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

32%
2.30
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.31

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2929
1.97
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.66
59%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

48%
21%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

21%
21%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

31%
55%
Clean Sheet52%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

48%
21%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

38%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2929
1.31
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.21
79%
Scored > 0.571%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

62%
55%
Over 1.552%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

48%
34%
Over 2.538%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

41%
10%
Over 3.510%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

10%
34%
BTTS33%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

31%
14%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

17%
24%
Scored Both Halves28%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

31%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2929
0.62
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.66
55%
Clean Sheet52%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

48%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2929
1.65
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.27
0.77
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.73
0.88
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.54
-0.28
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.16

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2929
31%9/29
Leading at HT33%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

34%10/29
52%15/29
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

41%12/29
17%5/29
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

24%7/29
48%14/29
HT/FT Same Outcome62%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

76%22/29
78%7/9
Led at HT → Won89%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%10/10
20%1/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered17%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

14%1/7

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeBatna at home · Annaba on the road
1414
2.71
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.79
86%12/14
Win Rate50%

Share of sampled matches won.

14%2/14
0%0/14
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%7/14
1.86
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.64
0.43
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.93
64%9/14
Clean Sheet50%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

36%5/14
36%5/14
BTTS36%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

36%5/14
43%6/14
Over 2.539%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

36%5/14
2.49
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.85
0.44
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.17