Super League 1·
Relegation Group - 9·05/16/2026·12:00
Larisa
Larisa
DDDLD
2-1
Finished
HT2-0
Atromitos
Atromitos
WLLWW
📍 AEL FC Arena, Larissa
Season statsSuper League 1
Larisa34matchesAtromitos34matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Super League 1.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
46%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

55%
1447
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1531
41%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

60%
51%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

50%
2.18
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.59

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3434
0.79
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.26
12%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

32%
44%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

29%
44%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

38%
18%
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

32%
29%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

32%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3434
0.88
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.24
71%
Scored > 0.569%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

68%
79%
Over 1.574%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

68%
35%
Over 2.543%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%
18%
Over 3.521%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

24%
59%
BTTS53%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

47%
0%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

12%
6%
Scored Both Halves16%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

26%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3434
1.53
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.18
13.35
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.59
4.32
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.09
2.85
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.91
66%
Save %69%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

71%
18%
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

32%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3434
0.92
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.31
1.37
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.38
-0.45
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.07
-0.05
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.21
0.08
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3434
11.21
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.50
3.76
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.29
6.06
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.29
54%
Box Shot %57%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

60%
34%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

31%
8%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3434
46%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

53%
77%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

82%
355.59
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

440.53
-0.02
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.11

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3434
9%3/34
Leading at HT24%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

38%13/34
38%13/34
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

41%14/34
53%18/34
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

21%7/34
76%26/34
HT/FT Same Outcome66%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

56%19/34
100%3/3
Led at HT → Won81%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

62%8/13
28%5/18
Trailed at HT → Recovered21%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

14%1/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 34/3434/343434
6%
0-15'8%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

10%
3%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

28%
23%
31-45'24%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

25%
32%
46-60'17%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

3%
13%
61-75'15%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

18%
23%
76-90+'20%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

18%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 34/3434/343434
31%10/32
Scored First41%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

50%15/30
69%22/32
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

50%15/30
40%4/10
Win when Scoring First47%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

53%8/15
0%0/22
Win when Conceding First10%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

20%3/15
45'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

22'
22'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

36'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 34/3434/343434
24%8/34
Scored after 75'21%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

18%6/34
24%8/34
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

18%6/34
57%4/7
Lead Saved after 75'74%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

91%10/11
43%3/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

9%1/11
0%0/34
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/34

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 34/3434/343434
84%26/31
Open-Play Share89%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

95%38/40
13%4/31
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

5%2/40
3%1/31
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/40
12%6/52
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%3/41
0%0/52
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

2%1/41

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3434
3.79
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.24
4.88
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.35
44%
Corner Share47%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

49%
-0.88
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.46
53%18/34
Match Corners > 8.546%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

38%13/34
44%15/34
Match Corners > 9.541%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

38%13/34
29%10/34
Match Corners > 10.529%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

29%10/34

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 34/3434/343434
3.26
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.47
15%5/34
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

6%2/34
14.94
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

15.06
90%27/30
Match Cards > 3.590%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

90%26/29
30/3429/34
83%25/30
Match Cards > 4.569%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

55%16/29
30/3429/34
64%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

63%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeLarisa at home · Atromitos on the road
1717
0.82
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.47
12%2/17
Win Rate26%

Share of sampled matches won.

41%7/17
41%7/17
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

35%6/17
0.88
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.35
1.53
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.06
18%3/17
Clean Sheet29%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

41%7/17
65%11/17
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

35%6/17
29%5/17
Over 2.538%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

47%8/17
0.99
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.45
1.21
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.50