Super League 1·
Relegation Group - 1·04/04/2026·05:00 PM
Panetolikos
Panetolikos
DDWLL
1-1
Finished
HT1-0
Atromitos
Atromitos
LDDWW
📍 Panetolikos Stadium, Agrinio
Season statsSuper League 1
Panetolikos26matchesAtromitos26matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Super League 1.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
56%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

56%
1474
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1540
45%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

56%
66%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

56%
1.65
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.02

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2626
1.00
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.12
27%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

27%
19%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

31%
54%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

42%
23%
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

31%
54%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

38%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2626
0.92
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
46%
Scored > 0.554%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

62%
62%
Over 1.562%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

62%
42%
Over 2.542%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

42%
23%
Over 3.521%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

19%
35%
BTTS38%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

42%
15%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

8%
12%
Scored Both Halves17%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

23%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2626
1.46
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.15
14.58
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.88
4.73
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.00
3.48
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.88
25/26
71%
Save %71%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

72%
23%
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

31%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2626
0.83
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.14
1.58
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.34
-0.75
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.20
0.05
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.14
0.08
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2626
9.04
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.23
2.69
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

2.96
5.62
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.23
62%
Box Shot %62%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

61%
30%
On-Target %29%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

29%
10%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2626
44%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

51%
78%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

81%
353.54
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

421.31
-0.09
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.02

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2626
19%5/26
Leading at HT27%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

35%9/26
42%11/26
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

46%12/26
38%10/26
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

19%5/26
65%17/26
HT/FT Same Outcome60%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

54%14/26
80%4/5
Led at HT → Won68%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

56%5/9
10%1/10
Trailed at HT → Recovered5%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 26/2626/262626
8%
0-15'8%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

8%
21%
16-30'29%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

38%
17%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
4%
46-60'2%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

0%
29%
61-75'23%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

17%
21%
76-90+'19%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

17%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 26/2626/262626
26%6/23
Scored First37%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

48%11/23
74%17/23
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

52%12/23
83%5/6
Win when Scoring First64%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

45%5/11
12%2/17
Win when Conceding First14%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

17%2/12
24'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

25'
39'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

39'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 26/2626/262626
19%5/26
Scored after 75'17%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

15%4/26
27%7/26
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

19%5/26
100%6/6
Lead Saved after 75'93%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

86%6/7
0%0/6
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

14%1/7
0%0/26
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/26

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 26/2626/262626
83%20/24
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%22/24
17%4/24
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%2/24
0%0/24
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/24
16%6/38
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

3%1/31
0%0/38
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/31

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2626
3.69
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.81
5.19
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.27
42%
Corner Share44%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

47%
-0.65
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.05
54%14/26
Match Corners > 8.544%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

35%9/26
46%12/26
Match Corners > 9.540%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

35%9/26
35%9/26
Match Corners > 10.529%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

23%6/26

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 26/2626/262626
2.35
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.65
23%6/26
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

4%1/26
13.23
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

15.81
82%18/22
Match Cards > 3.584%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

86%19/22
22/2622/26
55%12/22
Match Cards > 4.559%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

64%14/22
22/2622/26
61%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

62%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgePanetolikos at home · Atromitos on the road
1313
1.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.38
31%4/13
Win Rate35%

Share of sampled matches won.

38%5/13
62%8/13
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

38%5/13
1.15
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
1.77
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
15%2/13
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%5/13
46%6/13
BTTS38%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

31%4/13
69%9/13
Over 2.554%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

38%5/13
1.04
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.40
1.88
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.38