Jupiler Pro League·
Championship Group - 37·05/10/2026·07:30
Gent
Gent
LLDDL
1-1
Finished
HT1-1
Anderlecht
Anderlecht
LLLWW
📍 Planet Group Arena, Gent
Season statsJupiler Pro League
Gent36matchesAnderlecht36matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Jupiler Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
42%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

30%
1579
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1586
51%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

40%
33%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

19%
1.64
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.76

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3636
1.33
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.39
36%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

39%
25%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

22%
39%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

39%
25%
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

28%
28%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

28%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3636
1.42
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.44
72%
Scored > 0.572%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

72%
81%
Over 1.576%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

72%
53%
Over 2.551%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%
36%
Over 3.539%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

42%
56%
BTTS54%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

53%
19%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

19%
31%
Scored Both Halves25%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

19%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3636
1.39
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.47
13.94
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.64
4.78
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.47
3.36
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.86
70%
Save %67%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

64%
25%
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

28%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3636
1.26
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.38
1.36
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.74
-0.10
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.36
-0.09
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.05
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.09

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3636
12.69
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

14.89
4.25
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.81
8.53
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.92
67%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

60%
33%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

32%
11%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3636
49%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

54%
80%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

81%
421.72
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

446.86
-0.06
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.09

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3636
31%11/36
Leading at HT26%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

22%8/36
33%12/36
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

44%16/36
36%13/36
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%12/36
61%22/36
HT/FT Same Outcome60%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

58%21/36
64%7/11
Led at HT → Won69%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

75%6/8
23%3/13
Trailed at HT → Recovered24%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

25%3/12

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 36/3636/363636
15%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

12%
11%
16-30'11%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

10%
15%
31-45'15%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

14%
13%
46-60'17%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

20%
11%
61-75'15%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

18%
34%
76-90+'30%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

26%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 36/3636/363636
52%17/33
Scored First48%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

45%15/33
48%16/33
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

55%18/33
65%11/17
Win when Scoring First62%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

60%9/15
13%2/16
Win when Conceding First20%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

28%5/18
26'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

36'
26'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

32'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 36/3636/363636
36%13/36
Scored after 75'33%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

31%11/36
33%12/36
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

36%13/36
73%11/15
Lead Saved after 75'71%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

69%11/16
27%4/15
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

31%5/16
0%0/36
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

3%1/36

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 36/3636/363636
85%45/53
Open-Play Share85%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

86%43/50
13%7/53
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

12%6/50
2%1/53
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

2%1/50
4%2/49
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%6/55
0%0/49
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

5%3/55

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3636
4.58
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.97
6.03
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.75
43%
Corner Share49%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

56%
-2.43
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.61
67%24/36
Match Corners > 8.574%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

81%29/36
58%21/36
Match Corners > 9.565%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

72%26/36
53%19/36
Match Corners > 10.554%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

56%20/36

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 36/3636/363636
1.64
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.61
11%4/36
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

11%4/36
10.31
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.94
69%20/29
Match Cards > 3.574%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

79%27/34
29/3634/36
41%12/29
Match Cards > 4.553%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

65%22/34
29/3634/36
74%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

66%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGent at home · Anderlecht on the road
1818
1.56
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.06
44%8/18
Win Rate36%

Share of sampled matches won.

28%5/18
33%6/18
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%9/18
1.56
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.22
1.11
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.78
33%6/18
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%3/18
50%9/18
BTTS47%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

44%8/18
44%8/18
Over 2.544%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

44%8/18
1.24
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.39
1.35
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.84