Jupiler Pro League·
Championship Group - 32·04/12/2026·12:30
Anderlecht
Anderlecht
LLLDW
3-1
Finished
HT0-1
Gent
Gent
DWWWL
📍 Lotto Park, Brussels
Season statsJupiler Pro League
Anderlecht31matchesGent31matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Jupiler Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
37%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

64%
1564
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1587
44%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

59%
30%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

69%
4.21
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.86

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3131
1.42
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.48
39%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

42%
26%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

23%
35%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

35%
32%
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%
29%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

19%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3131
1.45
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.61
71%
Scored > 0.576%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

81%
68%
Over 1.577%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

87%
45%
Over 2.552%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

58%
39%
Over 3.539%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

39%
48%
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

61%
16%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

23%
23%
Scored Both Halves29%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

35%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3131
1.39
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.42
13.26
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.94
4.23
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.77
2.65
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.29
63%
Save %66%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

69%
32%
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3131
1.47
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.49
1.66
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.40
-0.19
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.09
0.02
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.16
0.10
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3131
14.87
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.00
4.84
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.52
9.00
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.71
61%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

67%
33%
On-Target %34%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
10%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3131
54%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

50%
81%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

81%
439.77
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

430.84
0.07
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.04

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3131
26%8/31
Leading at HT29%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

32%10/31
48%15/31
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

32%10/31
26%8/31
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

35%11/31
61%19/31
HT/FT Same Outcome60%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

58%18/31
75%6/8
Led at HT → Won73%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

70%7/10
13%1/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered20%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

27%3/11

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 31/3131/313131
12%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

15%
12%
16-30'11%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

10%
14%
31-45'15%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

15%
24%
46-60'19%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
17%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

12%
21%
76-90+'28%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

35%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 31/3131/313131
50%14/28
Scored First52%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

53%16/30
50%14/28
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

47%14/30
64%9/14
Win when Scoring First67%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

69%11/16
21%3/14
Win when Conceding First18%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

14%2/14
38'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

28'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 31/3131/313131
29%9/31
Scored after 75'35%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

42%13/31
39%12/31
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

32%10/31
67%10/15
Lead Saved after 75'73%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

79%11/14
33%5/15
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

21%3/14
3%1/31
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/31

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 31/3131/313131
86%36/42
Open-Play Share86%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

87%45/52
14%6/42
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

12%6/52
0%0/42
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

2%1/52
11%5/46
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

5%2/43
7%3/46
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/43

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3131
6.10
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.71
4.97
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.90
55%
Corner Share50%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

44%
-0.07
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-2.10
87%27/31
Match Corners > 8.576%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

65%20/31
77%24/31
Match Corners > 9.566%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

55%17/31
58%18/31
Match Corners > 10.555%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

52%16/31

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 31/3131/313131
2.61
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.58
10%3/31
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

13%4/31
14.13
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.42
80%24/30
Match Cards > 3.575%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

69%18/26
30/3126/31
67%20/30
Match Cards > 4.556%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

46%12/26
30/3126/31
69%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

72%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeAnderlecht at home · Gent on the road
1515
1.87
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.27
53%8/15
Win Rate43%

Share of sampled matches won.

33%5/15
20%3/15
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%6/15
1.67
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.47
0.93
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.73
47%7/15
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%2/15
53%8/15
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%10/15
47%7/15
Over 2.557%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%10/15
1.49
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.45
1.10
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.71