Bundesliga·
Relegation Group - 28·04/21/2026·14:30
Ried
Ried
DDWLD
2-1
Finished
HT2-0
Grazer AK
Grazer AK
DLWWW
📍 Innviertel Arena, Ried
Season statsBundesliga
Ried27matchesAK27matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Bundesliga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
57%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

56%
1596
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1475
53%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

56%
62%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

55%
2.68
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.38

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2727
1.33
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.11
37%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

26%
22%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

33%
41%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

41%
22%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%
30%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

33%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2727
1.26
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.19
70%
Scored > 0.569%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

67%
81%
Over 1.581%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

81%
48%
Over 2.552%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

56%
26%
Over 3.526%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

26%
56%
BTTS59%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

63%
22%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

22%
22%
Scored Both Halves24%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

26%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2727
1.37
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.48
12.93
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.41
4.30
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.67
2.81
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.15
66%
Save %62%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

59%
22%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2727
1.57
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.30
1.50
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.37
0.06
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.07
-0.31
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.05
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2727
12.15
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9.93
3.74
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.30
8.22
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.37
68%
Box Shot %66%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

64%
31%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

33%
10%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2727
48%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

47%
72%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

73%
323.81
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

354.26
-0.01
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.03

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2727
30%8/27
Leading at HT24%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

19%5/27
41%11/27
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

48%13/27
30%8/27
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%9/27
52%14/27
HT/FT Same Outcome61%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

70%19/27
50%4/8
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%5/5
25%2/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered24%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

22%2/9

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 27/2727/272727
9%
0-15'8%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

6%
9%
16-30'17%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

25%
26%
31-45'21%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

16%
18%
46-60'17%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

16%
15%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

13%
24%
76-90+'24%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

25%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 27/2727/272727
48%12/25
Scored First46%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

44%11/25
52%13/25
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

56%14/25
58%7/12
Win when Scoring First56%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

55%6/11
23%3/13
Win when Conceding First15%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

7%1/14
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

30'
31'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

31'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 27/2727/272727
30%8/27
Scored after 75'30%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

30%8/27
30%8/27
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

33%9/27
67%6/9
Lead Saved after 75'62%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

57%4/7
33%3/9
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

43%3/7
0%0/27
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/27

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 27/2727/272727
79%27/34
Open-Play Share79%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

78%25/32
21%7/34
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

19%6/32
0%0/34
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/32
11%4/37
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

3%1/40
0%0/37
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/40

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2727
4.22
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.70
4.85
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.70
47%
Corner Share45%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

44%
-0.54
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.40
56%15/27
Match Corners > 8.556%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

56%15/27
44%12/27
Match Corners > 9.543%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

41%11/27
33%9/27
Match Corners > 10.530%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

26%7/27

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 27/2727/272727
2.07
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.89
7%2/27
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

15%4/27
12.07
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.04
92%22/24
Match Cards > 3.587%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

83%19/23
24/2723/27
63%15/24
Match Cards > 4.562%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

61%14/23
24/2723/27
74%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

62%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeRied at home · AK on the road
1313
1.62
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.69
46%6/13
Win Rate31%

Share of sampled matches won.

15%2/13
31%4/13
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

62%8/13
1.31
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.92
1.23
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.69
31%4/13
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

8%1/13
46%6/13
BTTS46%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

46%6/13
46%6/13
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

54%7/13
1.65
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.03
1.44
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.48