Liga I·
Relegation Group - 1·03/15/2026·14:30
FCSB
FCSB
LWWLD
0-0
Finished
HT0-0
Metaloglobus
Metaloglobus
DLLLD
📍 National Arena, Bucharest
Season statsLiga I
FCSB30matchesMetaloglobus30matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Liga I.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
63%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

28%
1570
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1294
60%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

23%
65%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

32%
4.18
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.34

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3030
1.53
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.40
43%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

7%
23%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

20%
33%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

73%
27%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

3%
17%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

40%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3030
1.60
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.83
83%
Scored > 0.572%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

60%
73%
Over 1.578%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

83%
53%
Over 2.560%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%
37%
Over 3.537%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

37%
60%
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%
20%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

7%
37%
Scored Both Halves23%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

10%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3030
1.33
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.20
10.53
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

16.53
3.50
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.40
2.23
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.23
64%
Save %62%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

60%
27%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

3%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3030
2.56
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.10
1.45
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

2.44
1.11
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-1.35
-0.73
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.26
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3030
18.07
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.37
6.37
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.53
11.30
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

5.50
63%
Box Shot %58%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

53%
35%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
9%
Shot Conversion8%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

8%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3030
60%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

47%
82%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

77%
493.27
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

370.07
0.22
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.10

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3030
47%14/30
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

10%3/30
30%9/30
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

30%9/30
23%7/30
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

60%18/30
67%20/30
HT/FT Same Outcome70%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

73%22/30
71%10/14
Led at HT → Won52%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

33%1/3
14%1/7
Trailed at HT → Recovered13%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

11%2/18

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 30/3030/303030
18%
0-15'23%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

28%
10%
16-30'9%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

8%
22%
31-45'15%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

8%
10%
46-60'21%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

32%
16%
61-75'12%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

8%
22%
76-90+'19%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

16%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 30/3030/303030
72%21/29
Scored First48%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

24%7/29
28%8/29
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

76%22/29
57%12/21
Win when Scoring First36%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

14%1/7
13%1/8
Win when Conceding First9%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

5%1/22
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

17'
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

25'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 30/3030/303030
40%12/30
Scored after 75'25%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

10%3/30
30%9/30
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

37%11/30
86%12/14
Lead Saved after 75'76%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

67%2/3
14%2/14
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

33%1/3
0%0/30
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/30

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 30/3030/303030
78%38/49
Open-Play Share79%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

80%20/25
18%9/49
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

12%3/25
4%2/49
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

8%2/25
15%6/39
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

14%9/66
3%1/39
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%2/66

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3030
6.70
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.23
3.53
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

6.10
65%
Corner Share53%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

41%
4.08
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-2.25
60%18/30
Match Corners > 8.567%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

73%22/30
53%16/30
Match Corners > 9.555%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

57%17/30
50%15/30
Match Corners > 10.545%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

40%12/30

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 30/3030/303030
1.93
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.20
7%2/30
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

13%4/30
11.57
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.67
81%21/26
Match Cards > 3.569%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

57%13/23
26/3023/30
54%14/26
Match Cards > 4.544%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

35%8/23
26/3023/30
61%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

66%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeFCSB at home · Metaloglobus on the road
1515
1.60
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.13
47%7/15
Win Rate23%

Share of sampled matches won.

0%0/15
33%5/15
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

87%13/15
1.33
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.87
1.13
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.73
33%5/15
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/15
53%8/15
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%10/15
47%7/15
Over 2.567%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

87%13/15
2.39
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.06
1.18
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.75