Superliga·
Championship Group - 32·05/17/2026·12:00
FC Midtjylland
FC Midtjylland
WDDDW
2-3
Finished
HT2-0
Brondby
Brondby
LDLWW
📍 MCH Arena, Herning
Season statsSuperliga
Midtjylland31matchesBrondby31matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Superliga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
70%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

35%
1900
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1612
67%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

40%
73%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

30%
2.23
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.33

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3131
1.94
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.35
52%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

39%
39%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

19%
10%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

42%
32%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

39%
19%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

39%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3131
2.26
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.32
81%
Scored > 0.571%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

61%
81%
Over 1.574%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

68%
61%
Over 2.552%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

42%
42%
Over 3.531%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

19%
61%
BTTS48%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

35%
32%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

13%
35%
Scored Both Halves27%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

19%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3131
1.06
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.06
12.23
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.06
4.23
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.45
3.16
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.45
75%
Save %76%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

78%
32%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

39%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3131
1.70
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.60
1.47
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.23
0.23
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.37
0.16
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.49
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3131
14.10
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

14.42
5.52
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.71
9.35
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.45
66%
Box Shot %66%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

66%
39%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

33%
16%
Shot Conversion13%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3131
54%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

52%
80%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

84%
426.42
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

477.03
0.09
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.05

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3131
29%9/31
Leading at HT34%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

39%12/31
58%18/31
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

42%13/31
13%4/31
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

19%6/31
45%14/31
HT/FT Same Outcome56%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

68%21/31
67%6/9
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

83%10/12
75%3/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered38%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/6

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 31/3131/313131
13%
0-15'11%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

10%
13%
16-30'17%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

21%
18%
31-45'21%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

24%
19%
46-60'14%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

10%
13%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

14%
22%
76-90+'22%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

21%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 31/3131/313131
67%18/27
Scored First59%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

52%14/27
33%9/27
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

48%13/27
72%13/18
Win when Scoring First75%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

79%11/14
33%3/9
Win when Conceding First21%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

8%1/13
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

30'
29'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

40'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 31/3131/313131
35%11/31
Scored after 75'29%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

23%7/31
39%12/31
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

26%8/31
77%10/13
Lead Saved after 75'79%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

82%9/11
23%3/13
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

18%2/11
0%0/31
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/31

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 31/3131/313131
94%63/67
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

88%37/42
4%3/67
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

7%3/42
1%1/67
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

5%2/42
11%4/36
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

13%4/32
11%4/36
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/32

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3131
5.48
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.06
4.42
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.74
55%
Corner Share51%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

46%
1.58
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.56
65%20/31
Match Corners > 8.560%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

55%17/31
52%16/31
Match Corners > 9.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

48%15/31
45%14/31
Match Corners > 10.539%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

32%10/31

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 31/3131/313131
2.29
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.00
16%5/31
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

10%3/31
12.65
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.13
88%23/26
Match Cards > 3.583%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

78%21/27
26/3127/31
65%17/26
Match Cards > 4.559%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

52%14/27
26/3127/31
71%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

65%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeMidtjylland at home · Brondby on the road
1515
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.33
53%8/15
Win Rate47%

Share of sampled matches won.

40%6/15
7%1/15
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

47%7/15
2.73
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.93
1.40
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.87
20%3/15
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

47%7/15
73%11/15
BTTS47%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

20%3/15
73%11/15
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

27%4/15
2.11
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.42
1.25
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.19