Division di Honor·
Winners Stage - 8·05/09/2026·10:30 PM
Bubali
Bubali
DDWLL
0-4
Finished
HT0-3
Dakota
Dakota
DDLWW
Season statsDivision di Honor
Bubali16matchesDakota16matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Division di Honor.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
59%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

57%
1256
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1418
56%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

76%
61%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

39%
3.39
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.96

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1616
1.50
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.56
44%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

81%
19%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

13%
38%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

6%
13%
Clean Sheet13%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%
19%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

6%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1616
2.44
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

3.75
81%
Scored > 0.588%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

94%
94%
Over 1.594%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

94%
69%
Over 2.575%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

81%
63%
Over 3.559%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

56%
69%
BTTS75%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

81%
31%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

69%
50%
Scored Both Halves42%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

33%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1616
1.75
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.19
13%
Clean Sheet13%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1616
3.04
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.48
1.00
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.29
2.05
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.19
-0.77
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.59

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1616
50%3/6
Leading at HT47%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

44%4/9
33%2/6
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

44%4/9
17%1/6
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

11%1/9
83%5/6
HT/FT Same Outcome58%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

33%3/9
100%3/3
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%2/4
0%0/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/1

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeBubali at home · Dakota on the road
97
1.56
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

3.00
44%4/9
Win Rate72%

Share of sampled matches won.

100%7/7
33%3/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%0/7
1.89
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

5.14
1.44
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.14
11%1/9
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%2/7
67%6/9
BTTS69%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

71%5/7
56%5/9
Over 2.578%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

100%7/7
1.49
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.82
0.94
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.24