UEFA Champions League·
Round of 32·02/18/2026·15:00
Bodo/Glimt
Bodo/Glimt
WWWWD
3-1
Finished
HT1-1
Inter
Inter
WWWWW
📍 Aspmyra Stadion, Bodo

Stats below use each team's main league —EliteserienNorway·Serie AItaly

Last 10UEFA Champions League
Bodo/Glimt10matchesInter10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
85%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

86%
1853
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1978
74%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

79%
95%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

93%
4.09
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.80

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
2.20
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.50
70%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

80%
10%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

10%
20%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

10%
30%
Clean Sheet40%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%
10%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

0%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
2.90
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.50
90%
Scored > 0.595%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

100%
90%
Over 1.585%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

80%
90%
Over 2.575%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

60%
70%
Over 3.560%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

50%
60%
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%
40%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

30%
80%
Scored Both Halves65%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

50%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
13.50
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

9.30
8/10
5.13
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.20
8/10
4.57
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.10
7/10
78%
Save %72%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

66%
8/10
30%
Clean Sheet40%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
2.22
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.08
1.79
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.85
0.43
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.23
0.39
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.31
0.15
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1010
13.75
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

18.10
8/10
5.13
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

6.70
8/10
10.13
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

13.60
8/10
74%
Box Shot %74%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

75%
8/10
37%
On-Target %37%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

37%
8/10
19%
Shot Conversion16%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

14%
8/10

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1010
56%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

61%
8/10
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

88%
8/10
458.88
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

556.40
8/10
0.15
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.20

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
70%7/10
Leading at HT60%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

50%5/10
20%2/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

40%4/10
10%1/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

10%1/10
80%8/10
HT/FT Same Outcome75%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

70%7/10
86%6/7
Led at HT → Won93%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%5/5
0%0/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/1010/101010
0%
0-15'4%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

8%
28%
16-30'22%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

17%
28%
31-45'24%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
10%
46-60'11%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
17%
61-75'11%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

4%
17%
76-90+'27%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

38%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/1010/101010
60%6/10
Scored First65%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

70%7/10
40%4/10
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

30%3/10
83%5/6
Win when Scoring First85%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

86%6/7
50%2/4
Win when Conceding First58%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

67%2/3
25'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

36'
20'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

13'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/1010/101010
50%5/10
Scored after 75'50%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

50%5/10
10%1/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

30%3/10
100%6/6
Lead Saved after 75'92%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

83%5/6
0%0/6
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

17%1/6
0%0/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/1010/101010
97%28/29
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%22/24
3%1/29
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%2/24
0%0/29
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/24
0%0/10
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/11
0%0/10
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

9%1/11

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1010
5.43
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.20
7/10
7.14
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.20
7/10
43%
Corner Share53%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

62%
7/10
0.85
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

2.51
86%6/7
Match Corners > 8.563%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

40%4/10
7/10
86%6/7
Match Corners > 9.563%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

40%4/10
7/10
86%6/7
Match Corners > 10.563%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

40%4/10
7/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/1010/101010
0.38
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.70
8/10
13%1/8
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/10
8/10
6.63
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.50
8/10
75%3/4
Match Cards > 3.563%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

50%4/8
4/108/10
25%1/4
Match Cards > 4.531%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

38%3/8
4/108/10
63%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

79%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeBodo/Glimt at home · Inter on the road
64
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

3.00
67%4/6
Win Rate83%

Share of sampled matches won.

100%4/4
33%2/6
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%0/4
3.17
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.50
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.00
33%2/6
Clean Sheet67%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

100%4/4
50%3/6
BTTS25%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

0%0/4
83%5/6
Over 2.554%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

25%1/4
2.70
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.69
1.10
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

0.78