Copa Argentina·
Round of 64·02/17/2026·17:45
Tigre
Tigre
WWWDW
2-0
Finished
HT0-0
Claypole
Claypole
DDWDD

Stats below use each team's main league —Liga Profesional ArgentinaArgentina·Primera CArgentina

Last 10Copa Argentina
Tigre10matchesClaypole10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
81%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

67%
1726
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1530
71%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

63%
90%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

70%
2.27
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.69

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
2.10
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.50
60%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

30%
30%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

60%
10%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

10%
60%
Clean Sheet45%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%
30%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

40%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
1.30
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.10
70%
Scored > 0.565%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

60%
50%
Over 1.555%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

60%
20%
Over 2.525%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

30%
20%
Over 3.520%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

20%
30%
BTTS45%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%
20%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

30%
20%
Scored Both Halves20%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

20%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
0.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.70
14.44
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

9/100/10
2.67
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

9/100/10
2.11
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

9/100/10
79%
Save %

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

9/100/10
60%
Clean Sheet45%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
1.74
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.39
1.00
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.90
0.74
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.49
-0.44
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.39
0.16
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1010
10.33
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9/100/10
3.89
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

9/100/10
4.67
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9/100/10
45%
Box Shot %

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

9/100/10
38%
On-Target %

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

9/100/10
12%
Shot Conversion

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9/100/10

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1010
33%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

9/100/10
64%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

9/100/10
235.78
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

9/100/10
-0.19
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
40%4/10
Leading at HT30%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

20%2/10
60%6/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

60%6/10
0%0/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

20%2/10
70%7/10
HT/FT Same Outcome80%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

90%9/10
100%4/4
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%2/2
0/0
Trailed at HT → Recovered

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%1/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/109/101010
15%
0-15'8%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

0%
15%
16-30'11%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

6%
8%
31-45'10%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

13%
23%
46-60'18%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
23%
61-75'21%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

19%
15%
76-90+'33%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

50%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/109/101010
88%7/8
Scored First63%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

38%3/8
13%1/8
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

63%5/8
86%6/7
Win when Scoring First76%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

67%2/3
0%0/1
Win when Conceding First10%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

20%1/5
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

59'
73'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

39'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/109/101010
10%1/10
Scored after 75'27%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

44%4/9
40%4/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

22%2/9
86%6/7
Lead Saved after 75'93%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%3/3
14%1/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/3
10%1/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

22%2/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/109/101010
100%13/13
Open-Play Share81%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

63%10/16
0%0/13
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

38%6/16
0%0/13
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/16
20%1/5
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

50%6/12
0%0/5
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/12

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1010
3.33
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

9/100/10
5.78
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

9/100/10
37%
Corner Share

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

9/100/10
-1.52
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

67%6/9
Match Corners > 8.5

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

0/0
9/100/10
56%5/9
Match Corners > 9.5

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

0/0
9/100/10
56%5/9
Match Corners > 10.5

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

0/0
9/100/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/109/101010
2.56
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

9/100/10
11%1/9
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0/0
9/100/10
12.78
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

9/100/10
100%9/9
Match Cards > 3.5100%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%2/2
9/102/10
100%9/9
Match Cards > 4.550%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

0%0/2
9/102/10
77%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

57%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeTigre at home · Claypole on the road
45
3.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.20
100%4/4
Win Rate60%

Share of sampled matches won.

20%1/5
0%0/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%1/5
1.75
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.80
0.25
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.80
75%3/4
Clean Sheet48%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%1/5
25%1/4
BTTS43%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%3/5
25%1/4
Over 2.523%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

20%1/5
1.61
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.92
0.78
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.00