2. Division - Group 2·
Regular Season - 10·06/12/2026·04:00 PM
Follo
Follo
LLLLW
VS
Kjelsås
Kjelsås
LDWWW
📍 Langhus kunstgress
Season stats2. Division - Group 2
Follo9matchesKjelsås9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in 2. Division - Group 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
29%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

67%
1221
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1416
36%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

79%
22%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

55%
2.68
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.34

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
99
0.89
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.44
22%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

78%
22%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

11%
56%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

11%
11%
Clean Sheet11%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%
22%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

11%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
99
1.33
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.11
78%
Scored > 0.583%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

89%
89%
Over 1.589%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

89%
67%
Over 2.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

78%
44%
Over 3.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

56%
67%
BTTS72%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

78%
11%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

67%
44%
Scored Both Halves56%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

67%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
99
1.89
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.44
11%
Clean Sheet11%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
99
11%1/9
Leading at HT39%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

67%6/9
44%4/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

11%1/9
44%4/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

22%2/9
56%5/9
HT/FT Same Outcome67%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

78%7/9
100%1/1
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%6/6
25%1/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered38%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%1/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/99/999
0%
0-15'3%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

5%
8%
16-30'7%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

5%
25%
31-45'28%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

32%
25%
46-60'23%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

21%
17%
61-75'19%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

21%
25%
76-90+'20%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

16%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/99/999
22%2/9
Scored First50%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

78%7/9
78%7/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

22%2/9
50%1/2
Win when Scoring First75%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%7/7
14%1/7
Win when Conceding First7%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/2
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

32'
42'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

34'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/99/999
33%3/9
Scored after 75'33%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

33%3/9
44%4/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

67%6/9
50%2/4
Lead Saved after 75'75%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%7/7
50%2/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/7
0%0/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/99/999
100%12/12
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

84%16/19
0%0/12
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

16%3/19
0%0/12
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/19
12%2/17
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

15%2/13
0%0/17
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/13

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/99/999
89%8/9
Match Cards > 3.587%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

86%6/7
7/9
67%6/9
Match Cards > 4.555%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

43%3/7
7/9
75%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

73%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeFollo at home · Kjelsås on the road
54
0.80
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.50
20%1/5
Win Rate48%

Share of sampled matches won.

75%3/4
60%3/5
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%0/4
1.40
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.25
1.60
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.25
20%1/5
Clean Sheet10%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/4
60%3/5
BTTS80%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

100%4/4
60%3/5
Over 2.568%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%3/4