Veikkausliiga·
Regular Season - 11·06/17/2026·06:00 PM
SJK
SJK
LLWLL
VS
VPS
VPS
DLWWD
📍 OmaSp Stadion, Seinajoki
Season statsVeikkausliiga
SJK9matchesVPS9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Veikkausliiga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
48%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

67%
1568
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1388
51%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

64%
45%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

69%
3.20
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.06

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
99
0.67
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.44
11%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

33%
33%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

44%
56%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

22%
22%
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%
44%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

44%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
99
0.89
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.89
56%
Scored > 0.556%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

56%
78%
Over 1.561%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

44%
44%
Over 2.533%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

22%
22%
Over 3.517%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

11%
44%
BTTS44%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

44%
0%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

22%
22%
Scored Both Halves11%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

0%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
99
1.56
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.78
8.00
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

7.50
1/92/9
5.00
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

2.50
1/92/9
2.00
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

1.50
1/92/9
40%
Save %50%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

60%
1/92/9
22%
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
99
2.10
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.08
1.56
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.00
0.55
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.08
-0.52
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.09
0.15
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
99
22.00
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

7.00
1/92/9
8.00
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.50
1/92/9
17.00
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

5.50
1/92/9
77%
Box Shot %78%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

79%
1/92/9
36%
On-Target %43%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

50%
1/92/9
5%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

14%
1/92/9

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
99
53%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

43%
1/92/9
85%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

69%
1/92/9
448.00
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

266.00
1/92/9
-0.06
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.02

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
99
11%1/9
Leading at HT22%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

33%3/9
22%2/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

56%5/9
67%6/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

11%1/9
67%6/9
HT/FT Same Outcome61%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

56%5/9
100%1/1
Led at HT → Won83%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

67%2/3
33%2/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered67%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

100%1/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/99/999
0%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

25%
13%
16-30'19%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

25%
13%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

25%
25%
46-60'13%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

0%
13%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

13%
38%
76-90+'25%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

13%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/99/999
13%1/8
Scored First35%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

57%4/7
88%7/8
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

43%3/7
100%1/1
Win when Scoring First75%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

50%2/4
0%0/7
Win when Conceding First17%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

33%1/3
29'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

19'
17'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

54'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/99/999
33%3/9
Scored after 75'22%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

11%1/9
11%1/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

11%1/9
100%1/1
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%2/2
0%0/1
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/2
0%0/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/99/999
100%8/8
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

75%6/8
0%0/8
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

25%2/8
0%0/8
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/8
0%0/14
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

14%1/7
0%0/14
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/7

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
99
10.00
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.50
1/92/9
2.00
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.00
1/92/9
83%
Corner Share68%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

53%
1/92/9
1.59
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.48
100%1/1
Match Corners > 8.575%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

50%1/2
1/92/9
100%1/1
Match Corners > 9.575%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

50%1/2
1/92/9
100%1/1
Match Corners > 10.575%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

50%1/2
1/92/9

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/99/999
2.00
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.50
1/92/9
0%0/1
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/2
1/92/9
16.00
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.50
1/92/9
33%2/6
Match Cards > 3.560%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

86%6/7
6/97/9
33%2/6
Match Cards > 4.545%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

57%4/7
6/97/9
82%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

76%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeSJK at home · VPS on the road
55
1.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
20%1/5
Win Rate20%

Share of sampled matches won.

20%1/5
40%2/5
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%2/5
1.20
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.40
1.20
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.60
20%1/5
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%2/5
60%3/5
BTTS40%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

20%1/5
40%2/5
Over 2.520%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

0%0/5
2.04
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.71
1.31
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.31