Serie A·
Regular Season - 12·04/19/2026·15:00
Santos
Santos
DWLLW
2-3
Finished
HT1-1
Fluminense
Fluminense
LLDDW
📍 Estadio Urbano Caldeira, Santos
Season statsSerie A
Santos11matchesFluminense11matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
52%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

53%
1555
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1685
51%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

63%
52%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

42%
1.79
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.28

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1111
1.18
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.82
27%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

55%
36%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

18%
36%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

27%
27%
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%
9%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

0%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1111
1.27
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.64
91%
Scored > 0.595%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

100%
82%
Over 1.582%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

82%
55%
Over 2.555%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

55%
27%
Over 3.527%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

27%
73%
BTTS73%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

73%
9%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

27%
27%
Scored Both Halves32%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

36%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1111
1.45
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.18
12.82
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.00
4.18
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.64
2.82
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.36
67%
Save %70%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

73%
27%
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1111
1.13
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.36
1.14
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.01
-0.01
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.34
0.23
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.27
0.09
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.09

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1111
12.73
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

15.64
3.00
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

6.18
7.09
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.09
56%
Box Shot %57%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

58%
24%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

40%
10%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1111
48%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

60%
81%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

88%
384.09
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

525.73
-0.02
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.15

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1111
18%2/11
Leading at HT36%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

55%6/11
73%8/11
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

27%3/11
9%1/11
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

18%2/11
27%3/11
HT/FT Same Outcome45%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

64%7/11
50%1/2
Led at HT → Won58%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

67%4/6
100%1/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered50%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 11/1111/111111
0%
0-15'6%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

11%
20%
16-30'21%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

22%
20%
31-45'18%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

17%
20%
46-60'21%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

22%
20%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

6%
20%
76-90+'21%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 11/1111/111111
60%6/10
Scored First62%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

64%7/11
40%4/10
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

36%4/11
50%3/6
Win when Scoring First61%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

71%5/7
0%0/4
Win when Conceding First13%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

25%1/4
45'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

27'
15'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

24'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 11/1111/111111
18%2/11
Scored after 75'27%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

36%4/11
36%4/11
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

45%5/11
75%3/4
Lead Saved after 75'75%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

75%6/8
25%1/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

25%2/8
0%0/11
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/11

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 11/1111/111111
80%12/15
Open-Play Share90%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

100%18/18
13%2/15
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/18
7%1/15
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/18
20%3/15
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

8%1/13
0%0/15
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/13

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1111
5.55
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.09
4.91
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.18
53%
Corner Share56%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

59%
0.34
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.36
82%9/11
Match Corners > 8.577%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

73%8/11
73%8/11
Match Corners > 9.568%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

64%7/11
55%6/11
Match Corners > 10.541%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

27%3/11

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 11/1111/111111
3.27
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.18
9%1/11
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

9%1/11
12.73
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.00
80%8/10
Match Cards > 3.579%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

78%7/9
10/119/11
60%6/10
Match Cards > 4.563%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

67%6/9
10/119/11
60%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

65%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeSantos at home · Fluminense on the road
65
1.83
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
50%3/6
Win Rate35%

Share of sampled matches won.

20%1/5
17%1/6
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%2/5
1.33
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.40
0.83
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.40
33%2/6
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%1/5
67%4/6
BTTS73%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

80%4/5
33%2/6
Over 2.537%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

40%2/5
1.31
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.04
0.79
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

0.94