World Cup·
Group Stage - 1·06/15/2026·07:00 PM
Belgium
Belgium
WWDWW
VS
Egypt
Egypt
LWDWD
Neutral📍 Lumen Field, Seattle
Last 10World Cup
Belgium10matchesEgypt10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
81%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

59%
1639
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1593
76%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

62%
86%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

56%
3.99
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.46

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
2.40
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.60
70%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

40%
30%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

40%
0%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%
60%
Clean Sheet60%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

60%
10%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

40%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
3.70
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.10
90%
Scored > 0.575%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

60%
90%
Over 1.565%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

40%
60%
Over 2.545%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

30%
60%
Over 3.540%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

20%
40%
BTTS35%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

30%
20%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

10%
70%
Scored Both Halves45%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

20%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
0.60
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.60
6.20
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.30
1.90
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.90
1.30
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.50
68%
Save %79%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

90%
60%
Clean Sheet60%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

60%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
2.15
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

0.40
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.75
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.82
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.09
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1010
20.40
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

6.90
8.40
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.30
14.20
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

3.60
70%
Box Shot %61%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

52%
41%
On-Target %45%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

48%
18%
Shot Conversion17%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

16%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1010
64%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

44%
87%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

81%
567.50
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

405.80
0.43
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.04

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
60%6/10
Leading at HT45%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

30%3/10
20%2/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

70%7/10
20%2/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

0%0/10
70%7/10
HT/FT Same Outcome70%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

70%7/10
100%6/6
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%3/3
100%2/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0/0

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/1010/101010
3%
0-15'12%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

21%
11%
16-30'9%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

7%
16%
31-45'22%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

29%
35%
46-60'25%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

14%
11%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

14%
24%
76-90+'19%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

14%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/1010/101010
56%5/9
Scored First63%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

71%5/7
44%4/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

29%2/7
100%5/5
Win when Scoring First90%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

80%4/5
50%2/4
Win when Conceding First25%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/2
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

37'
19'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

43'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/1010/101010
60%6/10
Scored after 75'35%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

10%1/10
20%2/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

20%2/10
100%7/7
Lead Saved after 75'90%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%4/5
0%0/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%1/5
0%0/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

10%1/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/1010/101010
89%33/37
Open-Play Share87%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

86%12/14
11%4/37
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

7%1/14
0%0/37
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

7%1/14
0%0/6
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/5
0%0/6
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/5

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1010
9.10
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

2.60
2.60
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.80
78%
Corner Share54%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

31%
8.73
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.85
80%8/10
Match Corners > 8.565%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

50%5/10
80%8/10
Match Corners > 9.565%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

50%5/10
70%7/10
Match Corners > 10.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

30%3/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/1010/101010
1.00
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.80
0%0/10
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

20%2/10
11.60
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.60
50%3/6
Match Cards > 3.556%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

63%5/8
6/108/10
33%2/6
Match Cards > 4.535%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

38%3/8
6/108/10
68%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

47%