CAF Champions League·
1st Preliminary Round·10/19/2025·12:00
Vipers
Vipers
WWLWL
1-2
Finished
HT0-0
Power Dynamos
Power Dynamos
LDLWW

Stats below use each team's main league —South Australia State League 1Australia·Super LeagueZambia

Last 10CAF Champions League
Vipers10matchesDynamos10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
54%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

55%
1336
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1382
44%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

68%
63%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

41%
2.72
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.30

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
1.10
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.60
30%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

40%
20%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

40%
50%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%
30%
Clean Sheet40%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%
10%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

30%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
1.10
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.90
90%
Scored > 0.580%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

70%
70%
Over 1.560%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

50%
70%
Over 2.545%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

20%
40%
Over 3.520%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

0%
70%
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%
10%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

10%
10%
Scored Both Halves10%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

10%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.70
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.60
30%
Clean Sheet40%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
0.91
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

0.84
0.98
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.42
-0.07
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.42
0.23
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.42

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
30%3/10
Leading at HT20%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

10%1/10
40%4/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

80%8/10
30%3/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

10%1/10
50%5/10
HT/FT Same Outcome55%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

60%6/10
33%1/3
Led at HT → Won67%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%1/1
0%0/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/105/101010
23%
0-15'24%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

25%
31%
16-30'28%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

25%
8%
31-45'4%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

0%
15%
46-60'8%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

0%
8%
61-75'4%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

0%
15%
76-90+'33%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

50%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/105/101010
67%6/9
Scored First53%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

40%2/5
33%3/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

60%3/5
50%3/6
Win when Scoring First75%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%2/2
0%0/3
Win when Conceding First0%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/3
23'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

53'
20'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

43'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/105/101010
20%2/10
Scored after 75'30%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

40%2/5
40%4/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

0%0/5
100%3/3
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%1/1
0%0/3
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/1
20%2/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

40%2/5

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/105/101010
85%11/13
Open-Play Share80%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

75%3/4
0%0/13
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

25%1/4
15%2/13
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/4
13%2/15
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/4
0%0/15
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/4

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/105/101010
100%1/1
Match Cards > 3.5

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

0/0
1/100/10
0%0/1
Match Cards > 4.5

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

0/0
1/100/10
100%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

100%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeVipers at home · Dynamos on the road
46
1.25
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.17
25%1/4
Win Rate21%

Share of sampled matches won.

17%1/6
25%1/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

17%1/6
1.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.67
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.67
50%2/4
Clean Sheet42%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%2/6
50%2/4
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%3/6
50%2/4
Over 2.533%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

17%1/6
1.06
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.77
0.62
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

0.47