Premier League·
Regular Season - 19·10/15/2025·08:30
FC Slutsk
FC Slutsk
DLLLL
2-1
Finished
HT1-0
Neman
Neman
WDLLW
📍 Stadyen Haradski, Slutsk
Season statsPremier League
Slutsk24matchesNeman22matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Premier League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
34%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

46%
1214
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1409
38%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

43%
30%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

48%
1.95
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.20

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2422
0.71
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.59
17%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

50%
21%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

9%
63%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

41%
29%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

32%
58%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

32%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2422
0.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.41
42%
Scored > 0.555%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

68%
58%
Over 1.559%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

59%
42%
Over 2.544%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

45%
8%
Over 3.516%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

23%
25%
BTTS33%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

41%
0%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

23%
8%
Scored Both Halves18%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

27%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2422
1.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.95
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.00
0/241/22
Save %

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

0%
0/241/22
29%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

32%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2422
0.55
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.49
1.76
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.51
-1.21
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.08
-0.07
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.20
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.34

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2422
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.00
0/241/22

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2422
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

63%
0/241/22
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.22

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2422
13%3/24
Leading at HT18%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

23%5/22
46%11/24
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

45%10/22
42%10/24
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

32%7/22
67%16/24
HT/FT Same Outcome58%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

50%11/22
67%2/3
Led at HT → Won83%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%5/5
0%0/10
Trailed at HT → Recovered14%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

29%2/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 24/2422/222422
15%
0-15'16%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

16%
15%
16-30'17%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

19%
31%
31-45'23%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

16%
0%
46-60'9%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

19%
8%
61-75'5%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

3%
31%
76-90+'29%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

28%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 24/2422/222422
33%7/21
Scored First40%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

48%10/21
67%14/21
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

52%11/21
57%4/7
Win when Scoring First79%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%10/10
0%0/14
Win when Conceding First5%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

9%1/11
43'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
24'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

35'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 24/2422/222422
17%4/24
Scored after 75'27%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

36%8/22
25%6/24
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

18%4/22
100%2/2
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%10/10
0%0/2
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/10
4%1/24
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

9%2/22

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 24/2422/222422
85%11/13
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

91%29/32
8%1/13
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

6%2/32
8%1/13
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/32
5%2/37
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

5%1/20
0%0/37
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/20

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2422
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

0.00
0/241/22
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

2.00
0/241/22
Corner Share

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

0%
0/241/22
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-5.46
0/0
Match Corners > 8.5

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

0%0/1
0/241/22
0/0
Match Corners > 9.5

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

0%0/1
0/241/22
0/0
Match Corners > 10.5

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

0%0/1
0/241/22

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 24/2422/222422
1.63
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.59
19/2417/22
0%0/19
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

12%2/17
19/2417/22
0.00
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

0.18
19/2417/22
47%8/17
Match Cards > 3.557%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

67%12/18
17/2418/22
29%5/17
Match Cards > 4.529%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

28%5/18
17/2418/22
72%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

55%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeSlutsk at home · Neman on the road
1211
0.67
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.45
17%2/12
Win Rate31%

Share of sampled matches won.

45%5/11
67%8/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

45%5/11
0.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.45
1.42
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.09
25%3/12
Clean Sheet31%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

36%4/11
25%3/12
BTTS31%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

36%4/11
42%5/12
Over 2.544%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

45%5/11
0.49
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.29
1.78
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.91