NM Cupen·
Round of 16·03/07/2026·10:00
Bjarg
Bjarg
DWDWW
0-3
Finished
HT0-1
Viking
Viking
DDWWW
📍 Stavollen kunstgress

Stats below use each team's main league —3. Division - Girone 4Norway·EliteserienNorway

Last 10NM Cupen
Bjarg10matchesViking10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
73%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

81%
1523
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1835
79%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

85%
67%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

76%
4.02
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.63

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
2.30
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.60
70%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

80%
20%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

20%
10%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%
30%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%
10%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

0%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
3.40
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.80
90%
Scored > 0.595%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

100%
90%
Over 1.590%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

90%
70%
Over 2.570%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

70%
60%
Over 3.555%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

50%
60%
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%
40%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

40%
63%
Scored Both Halves56%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

50%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.80
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.40
0/105/10
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.00
0/105/10
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.60
0/105/10
Save %

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

90%
0/105/10
30%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
3.10
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.83
0.79
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.19
2.31
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.64
0.45
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.19

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1010
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

15.80
0/105/10
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

7.00
0/105/10
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

11.00
0/105/10
Box Shot %

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

70%
0/105/10
On-Target %

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

44%
0/105/10
Shot Conversion

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

20%
0/105/10

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1010
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

53%
0/105/10
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

79%
0/105/10
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

421.40
0/105/10
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.01

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
63%5/8
Leading at HT66%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

70%7/10
38%3/8
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

30%3/10
0%0/8
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

0%0/10
75%6/8
HT/FT Same Outcome63%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

50%5/10
100%5/5
Led at HT → Won86%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

71%5/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 7/1010/101010
7%
0-15'7%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

7%
28%
16-30'25%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

22%
24%
31-45'21%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

19%
21%
46-60'20%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

19%
17%
61-75'20%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

22%
3%
76-90+'7%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

11%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 7/1010/101010
57%4/7
Scored First74%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

90%9/10
43%3/7
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

10%1/10
100%4/4
Win when Scoring First89%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

78%7/9
67%2/3
Win when Conceding First83%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

100%1/1
16'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

35'
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

13'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 7/1010/101010
14%1/7
Scored after 75'22%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

30%3/10
43%3/7
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

10%1/10
100%6/6
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%7/7
0%0/6
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/7
14%1/7
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 7/1010/101010
97%28/29
Open-Play Share96%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

96%26/27
3%1/29
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

4%1/27
0%0/29
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/27
0%0/7
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/9
0%0/7
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

11%1/9

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1010
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.60
0/105/10
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.20
0/105/10
Corner Share

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

61%
0/105/10
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

3.26
0/0
Match Corners > 8.5

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

60%3/5
0/105/10
0/0
Match Corners > 9.5

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

20%1/5
0/105/10
0/0
Match Corners > 10.5

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

20%1/5
0/105/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 7/1010/101010
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.20
0/105/10
0/0
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/5
0/105/10
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

9.40
0/105/10
0/0
Match Cards > 3.5

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

43%3/7
0/107/10
0/0
Match Cards > 4.5

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

29%2/7
0/107/10
0%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

59%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeBjarg at home · Viking on the road
46
2.25
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.33
75%3/4
Win Rate71%

Share of sampled matches won.

67%4/6
25%1/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%0/6
4.75
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.83
0.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
50%2/4
Clean Sheet42%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%2/6
25%1/4
BTTS46%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%4/6
75%3/4
Over 2.563%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%3/6
2.99
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.44
0.62
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.35