NPFL·
Regular Season - 26·03/19/2026·11:00
Niger Tornadoes
Niger Tornadoes
DLDLL
1-0
Finished
HT0-0
Rivers United
Rivers United
LLWWL
📍 Bako Kontagora Stadium
Season statsNPFL
Tornadoes29matchesUnited29matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in NPFL.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
34%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

49%
1280
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1311
39%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

49%
29%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

48%
1.67
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.34

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2929
1.24
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.79
34%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

48%
21%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

34%
45%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

17%
41%
Clean Sheet48%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

55%
41%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

24%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2929
1.03
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.97
59%
Scored > 0.567%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

76%
62%
Over 1.552%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

41%
31%
Over 2.528%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

24%
10%
Over 3.59%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

7%
28%
BTTS33%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

38%
3%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

10%
17%
Scored Both Halves12%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

7%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2929
0.97
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.62
41%
Clean Sheet48%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

55%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2929
0.92
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.33
1.35
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.94
-0.43
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.38
-0.08
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.24
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2929
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.03

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2929
31%9/29
Leading at HT22%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

14%4/29
34%10/29
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

62%18/29
34%10/29
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

24%7/29
72%21/29
HT/FT Same Outcome64%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

55%16/29
89%8/9
Led at HT → Won94%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%4/4
10%1/10
Trailed at HT → Recovered26%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

43%3/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 28/2928/292929
19%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

11%
13%
16-30'12%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

11%
10%
31-45'8%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

7%
13%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

18%
16%
61-75'15%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

14%
29%
76-90+'34%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

39%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 28/2928/292929
42%11/26
Scored First52%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

63%15/24
58%15/26
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

38%9/24
91%10/11
Win when Scoring First85%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

80%12/15
0%0/15
Win when Conceding First11%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

22%2/9
26'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

50'
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

28'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 28/2928/292929
29%8/28
Scored after 75'34%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

39%11/28
21%6/28
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

11%3/28
83%10/12
Lead Saved after 75'92%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%9/9
17%2/12
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/9
7%2/28
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

4%1/28

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 28/2928/292929
94%29/31
Open-Play Share95%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

96%27/28
3%1/31
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

4%1/28
3%1/31
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/28
15%4/27
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

6%1/18
0%0/27
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/18

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2929
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.02

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 28/2928/292929
42%8/19
Match Cards > 3.555%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

68%15/22
19/2922/29
26%5/19
Match Cards > 4.531%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

36%8/22
19/2922/29
68%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

78%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeTornadoes at home · United on the road
1414
2.21
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
64%9/14
Win Rate39%

Share of sampled matches won.

14%2/14
7%1/14
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

29%4/14
1.71
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.64
0.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.93
71%10/14
Clean Sheet54%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

36%5/14
29%4/14
BTTS39%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%7/14
36%5/14
Over 2.529%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

21%3/14
1.88
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.75
0.62
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.27