Cup·
3rd Round·08/10/2025·10:00
Sprimont
Sprimont
WLLDL
VS
Torhout
Torhout
LLLWD

Stats below use each team's main league —Third Amateur Division - ACFF BBelgium·Second Amateur Division - VFV ABelgium

Last 10Cup
Sprimont10matchesTorhout10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
45%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

38%
1469
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1456
56%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

48%
34%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

27%
3.28
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

4.95

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
1.60
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.40
50%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

40%
10%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

20%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%
30%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%
20%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

0%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
2.10
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.10
80%
Scored > 0.590%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

100%
80%
Over 1.590%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

100%
70%
Over 2.580%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

90%
40%
Over 3.555%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

70%
50%
BTTS75%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

100%
20%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

40%
0%
Scored Both Halves38%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

75%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.20
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.50
30%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
2.42
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.82
2.42
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

2.28
0.00
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.46
-0.53
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.28

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
0%0/1
Leading at HT0%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

0%0/4
100%1/1
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

75%3/4
0%0/1
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

25%1/4
100%1/1
HT/FT Same Outcome75%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

50%2/4
0/0
Trailed at HT → Recovered

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/1

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeSprimont at home · Torhout on the road
76
1.43
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.67
43%3/7
Win Rate46%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%3/6
43%3/7
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%2/6
1.71
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.17
1.43
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.50
29%2/7
Clean Sheet14%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/6
57%4/7
BTTS79%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

100%6/6
71%5/7
Over 2.577%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

83%5/6
1.34
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.75
1.34
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.69