UEFA Europa Conference League·
2nd Qualifying Round·07/31/2025·12:00
Dila
Dila
DLWWW
3-3
Finished
HT1-1
Riga
Riga
WWWWD
📍 Stadioni Tengiz Burjanadze, Gori

Stats below use each team's main league —Erovnuli LigaGeorgia·VirsligaLatvia

Last 10UEFA Europa Conference League
Dila10matchesRiga10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
68%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

87%
1491
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1653
76%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

89%
60%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

85%
2.28
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.71

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
2.50
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.80
80%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

90%
10%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

10%
10%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%
40%
Clean Sheet40%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%
10%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

0%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
2.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.60
90%
Scored > 0.595%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

100%
80%
Over 1.590%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

100%
70%
Over 2.570%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

70%
20%
Over 3.535%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

50%
60%
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%
50%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

50%
50%
Scored Both Halves60%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

70%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
0.90
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.80
40%
Clean Sheet40%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
2.10
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

3.48
1.11
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.04
1.00
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

2.44
-0.43
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.87

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
10%1/10
Leading at HT45%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

80%8/10
80%8/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

10%1/10
10%1/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

10%1/10
30%3/10
HT/FT Same Outcome55%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

80%8/10
100%1/1
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%8/8
0%0/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered50%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

100%1/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/1010/101010
0%
0-15'4%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

8%
4%
16-30'14%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

24%
22%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

16%
7%
46-60'12%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

16%
11%
61-75'10%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

8%
56%
76-90+'42%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

28%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/1010/101010
50%5/10
Scored First60%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

70%7/10
50%5/10
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

30%3/10
80%4/5
Win when Scoring First90%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%7/7
80%4/5
Win when Conceding First73%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

67%2/3
74'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

22'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

24'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/1010/101010
80%8/10
Scored after 75'70%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

60%6/10
30%3/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

10%1/10
100%3/3
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%7/7
0%0/3
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/7
40%4/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

10%1/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/1010/101010
67%18/27
Open-Play Share79%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%23/25
33%9/27
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

4%1/25
0%0/27
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

4%1/25
53%9/17
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

25%2/8
6%1/17
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

13%1/8

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/1010/101010
100%8/8
Match Cards > 3.575%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

50%4/8
8/108/10
75%6/8
Match Cards > 4.556%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

38%3/8
8/108/10
60%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

62%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeDila at home · Riga on the road
43
3.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

3.00
100%4/4
Win Rate100%

Share of sampled matches won.

100%3/3
0%0/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%0/3
2.25
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.67
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
50%2/4
Clean Sheet42%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%1/3
50%2/4
BTTS58%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%2/3
50%2/4
Over 2.558%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%2/3
2.35
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

3.61
1.22
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.15