Premier League·
Regular Season - 18·12/06/2025·11:30
Zenit
Zenit
WWWDL
2-0
Finished
HT2-0
Akron
Akron
LWWWD
📍 Gazprom Arena, Saint Petersburg
Season statsPremier League
Zenit17matchesAkron17matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Premier League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
79%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

56%
1566
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1315
77%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

48%
80%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

64%
2.01
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.13

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1717
2.12
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.24
59%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

29%
35%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

35%
6%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

35%
47%
Clean Sheet32%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

18%
12%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

12%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1717
1.88
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.29
88%
Scored > 0.588%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

88%
82%
Over 1.585%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

88%
41%
Over 2.547%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

53%
24%
Over 3.524%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

24%
47%
BTTS59%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

71%
18%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

12%
35%
Scored Both Halves21%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

6%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1717
0.71
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.41
9.88
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.94
2.94
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.06
2.44
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

4.07
16/1715/17
78%
Save %74%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

71%
47%
Clean Sheet32%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

18%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1717
2.33
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.43
0.77
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.92
1.56
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.50
-0.35
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.14
0.19
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1717
12.29
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.00
5.35
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.76
8.94
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.53
73%
Box Shot %71%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

68%
44%
On-Target %39%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
15%
Shot Conversion14%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1717
61%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

44%
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

74%
480.76
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

312.41
0.21
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.11

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1717
29%5/17
Leading at HT29%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

29%5/17
47%8/17
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

35%6/17
24%4/17
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

35%6/17
47%8/17
HT/FT Same Outcome44%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

41%7/17
80%4/5
Led at HT → Won50%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

20%1/5
75%3/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered54%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

33%2/6

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 17/1717/171717
15%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
9%
16-30'7%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

4%
12%
31-45'21%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

30%
15%
46-60'14%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
24%
61-75'21%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

17%
24%
76-90+'23%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 17/1717/171717
75%12/16
Scored First64%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

53%9/17
25%4/16
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

47%8/17
67%8/12
Win when Scoring First56%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

44%4/9
50%2/4
Win when Conceding First31%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

13%1/8
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

52'
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

16'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 17/1717/171717
41%7/17
Scored after 75'35%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

29%5/17
12%2/17
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

35%6/17
82%9/11
Lead Saved after 75'71%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

60%3/5
18%2/11
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

40%2/5
6%1/17
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/17

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 17/1717/171717
79%26/33
Open-Play Share81%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

83%19/23
18%6/33
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

13%3/23
3%1/33
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

4%1/23
0%0/11
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

9%2/23
0%0/11
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/23

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1717
5.94
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.35
3.53
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.76
63%
Corner Share55%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

48%
2.90
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.76
59%10/17
Match Corners > 8.562%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

65%11/17
53%9/17
Match Corners > 9.547%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

41%7/17
41%7/17
Match Corners > 10.535%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

29%5/17

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 17/1717/171717
1.59
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.88
6%1/17
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/17
9.82
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.88
64%9/14
Match Cards > 3.562%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

60%9/15
14/1715/17
43%6/14
Match Cards > 4.541%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

40%6/15
14/1715/17
61%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

59%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeZenit at home · Akron on the road
88
2.75
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.62
88%7/8
Win Rate69%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%4/8
0%0/8
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

38%3/8
2.38
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.38
0.63
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.25
50%4/8
Clean Sheet44%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%3/8
50%4/8
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%4/8
50%4/8
Over 2.556%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

63%5/8
2.98
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.43
0.85
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.86