Segunda División·
Regular Season - 22·01/19/2026·14:30
Granada CF
Granada CF
DLLDL
0-0
Finished
HT0-0
Eibar
Eibar
LWWLD
📍 Estadio Nuevo Los Cármenes, Granada
Season statsSegunda División
CF21matchesEibar21matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Segunda División.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
40%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

52%
1452
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1477
53%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

46%
26%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

58%
2.38
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.17

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2121
1.05
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.14
19%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

29%
48%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

29%
33%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

43%
29%
Clean Sheet29%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%
33%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

33%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2121
1.10
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.10
67%
Scored > 0.567%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

67%
67%
Over 1.569%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

71%
43%
Over 2.548%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

52%
29%
Over 3.524%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

19%
57%
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

52%
10%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

14%
14%
Scored Both Halves14%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

14%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2121
1.29
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.24
12.00
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.86
4.10
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.14
2.86
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.90
70%
Save %70%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
29%
Clean Sheet29%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2121
1.52
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.67
1.37
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.31
0.15
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.37
-0.31
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.44
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.14

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2121
12.67
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

12.71
3.67
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.19
7.38
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.52
58%
Box Shot %63%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

67%
29%
On-Target %31%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

33%
9%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2121
50%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

51%
81%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

80%
359.95
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

440.76
-0.02
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.00

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2121
24%5/21
Leading at HT21%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

19%4/21
52%11/21
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

48%10/21
24%5/21
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%7/21
62%13/21
HT/FT Same Outcome57%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

52%11/21
60%3/5
Led at HT → Won68%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

75%3/4
40%2/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered41%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

43%3/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 21/2121/212121
21%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

9%
29%
16-30'24%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

18%
8%
31-45'4%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

0%
13%
46-60'22%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

32%
21%
61-75'22%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

23%
8%
76-90+'13%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

18%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 21/2121/212121
47%8/17
Scored First43%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

39%7/18
53%9/17
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

61%11/18
50%4/8
Win when Scoring First46%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

43%3/7
0%0/9
Win when Conceding First14%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

27%3/11
22'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
39'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

31'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 21/2121/212121
10%2/21
Scored after 75'14%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

19%4/21
19%4/21
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

29%6/21
100%4/4
Lead Saved after 75'90%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%4/5
0%0/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%1/5
0%0/21
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

5%1/21

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 21/2121/212121
92%22/24
Open-Play Share89%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

86%19/22
4%1/24
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

14%3/22
4%1/24
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/22
15%4/26
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

15%4/27
0%0/26
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

4%1/27

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2121
4.43
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.67
4.86
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.05
48%
Corner Share51%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

54%
-0.73
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.69
48%10/21
Match Corners > 8.548%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

48%10/21
43%9/21
Match Corners > 9.538%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

33%7/21
43%9/21
Match Corners > 10.533%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

24%5/21

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 21/2121/212121
2.38
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.38
19%4/21
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

14%3/21
13.10
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.24
89%17/19
Match Cards > 3.592%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

95%18/19
19/2119/21
53%10/19
Match Cards > 4.566%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

79%15/19
19/2119/21
69%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

62%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeCF at home · Eibar on the road
1110
1.09
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.30
18%2/11
Win Rate9%

Share of sampled matches won.

0%0/10
27%3/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

70%7/10
1.18
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.50
1.18
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.70
27%3/11
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

10%1/10
64%7/11
BTTS57%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%5/10
36%4/11
Over 2.538%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

40%4/10
1.54
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.20
1.23
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.65