Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 34·05/09/2026·14:00
Nancy
Nancy
WDLDD
3-2
Finished
HT2-0
Dunkerque
Dunkerque
LWLLD
📍 Stade Marcel Picot, Nancy
Season statsLigue 2
Nancy33matchesDunkerque33matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
54%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

38%
1481
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1564
49%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

41%
58%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

35%
3.16
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.24

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3333
1.03
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.30
24%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

33%
30%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

30%
45%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

36%
21%
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

18%
39%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

27%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3333
0.97
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.55
61%
Scored > 0.567%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

73%
67%
Over 1.570%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

73%
52%
Over 2.552%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

52%
27%
Over 3.529%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

30%
52%
BTTS56%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

61%
15%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

21%
18%
Scored Both Halves27%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

36%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3333
1.52
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.27
11.67
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.00
4.33
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.64
2.91
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.42
32/33
65%
Save %66%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

67%
21%
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

18%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3333
1.36
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.72
2.06
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.76
-0.69
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.04
-0.28
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.28
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.17

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3333
10.70
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.21
3.00
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.12
6.24
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.21
58%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

71%
28%
On-Target %34%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

40%
9%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

15%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3333
42%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

57%
74%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

86%
333.45
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

502.88
-0.20
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.15

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3333
24%8/33
Leading at HT27%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

30%10/33
42%14/33
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

39%13/33
33%11/33
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

30%10/33
55%18/33
HT/FT Same Outcome56%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

58%19/33
63%5/8
Led at HT → Won66%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

70%7/10
27%3/11
Trailed at HT → Recovered29%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

30%3/10

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 33/3333/333333
19%
0-15'16%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
19%
16-30'18%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

17%
10%
31-45'14%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

19%
13%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

19%
10%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

19%
29%
76-90+'20%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

12%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 33/3333/333333
38%11/29
Scored First43%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

48%15/31
62%18/29
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

52%16/31
45%5/11
Win when Scoring First49%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

53%8/15
17%3/18
Win when Conceding First18%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

19%3/16
20'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

27'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 33/3333/333333
27%9/33
Scored after 75'20%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

12%4/33
33%11/33
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

30%10/33
78%7/9
Lead Saved after 75'78%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

79%11/14
22%2/9
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

21%3/14
0%0/33
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/33

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 33/3333/333333
90%28/31
Open-Play Share90%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

90%47/52
10%3/31
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

6%3/52
0%0/31
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

4%2/52
6%3/51
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

10%4/41
2%1/51
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

2%1/41

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3333
4.45
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.30
4.67
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.33
49%
Corner Share49%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

50%
-0.65
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.37
61%20/33
Match Corners > 8.556%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

52%17/33
52%17/33
Match Corners > 9.541%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

30%10/33
36%12/33
Match Corners > 10.527%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

18%6/33

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 33/3333/333333
2.06
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.82
18%6/33
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

12%4/33
14.73
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.88
68%21/31
Match Cards > 3.569%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

71%22/31
31/3331/33
45%14/31
Match Cards > 4.545%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

45%14/31
31/3331/33
63%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

69%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeNancy at home · Dunkerque on the road
1616
0.94
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.31
25%4/16
Win Rate31%

Share of sampled matches won.

38%6/16
56%9/16
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

44%7/16
0.81
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.69
1.69
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.44
25%4/16
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%2/16
38%6/16
BTTS53%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

69%11/16
44%7/16
Over 2.556%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

69%11/16
1.03
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.22
2.48
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.98