Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 32·04/24/2026·14:00
Laval
Laval
WDDWL
0-0
Finished
HT0-0
Rodez
Rodez
WWDDW
📍 Stade Francis Le Basser, Laval
Season statsLigue 2
Laval31matchesRodez31matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
58%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

72%
1491
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1514
51%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

73%
65%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

71%
2.70
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.61

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3131
0.90
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.65
16%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

42%
42%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

39%
42%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

19%
23%
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%
45%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

16%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3131
0.90
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.32
55%
Scored > 0.569%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

84%
71%
Over 1.574%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

77%
35%
Over 2.542%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

48%
23%
Over 3.521%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

19%
45%
BTTS58%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

71%
6%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

29%
19%
Scored Both Halves21%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

23%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3131
1.39
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.19
12.52
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.00
4.32
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.90
3.06
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.71
71%
Save %73%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

76%
23%
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3131
1.36
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.85
1.63
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.29
-0.27
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.56
-0.28
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.35
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.17

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3131
9.13
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.00
3.48
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.74
5.74
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.26
63%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

66%
38%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
10%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3131
46%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

40%
77%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

75%
388.10
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

299.42
-0.14
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.20

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3131
26%8/31
Leading at HT24%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

23%7/31
42%13/31
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

55%17/31
32%10/31
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

23%7/31
58%18/31
HT/FT Same Outcome53%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

48%15/31
50%4/8
Led at HT → Won54%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

57%4/7
30%3/10
Trailed at HT → Recovered51%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

71%5/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 31/3131/313131
7%
0-15'9%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

12%
20%
16-30'21%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

21%
27%
31-45'16%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

5%
20%
46-60'17%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

14%
7%
61-75'12%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

17%
20%
76-90+'25%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

31%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 31/3131/313131
48%13/27
Scored First52%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

55%16/29
52%14/27
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

45%13/29
31%4/13
Win when Scoring First37%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

44%7/16
7%1/14
Win when Conceding First27%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

46%6/13
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

33'
38'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

31'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 31/3131/313131
16%5/31
Scored after 75'23%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

29%9/31
29%9/31
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

16%5/31
57%4/7
Lead Saved after 75'73%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

89%8/9
43%3/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

11%1/9
0%0/31
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

3%1/31

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 31/3131/313131
70%21/30
Open-Play Share80%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

90%38/42
20%6/30
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

7%3/42
10%3/30
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

2%1/42
10%4/41
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

8%3/37
2%1/41
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/37

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3131
4.71
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.52
5.74
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.61
45%
Corner Share45%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

45%
-1.41
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.39
74%23/31
Match Corners > 8.569%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

65%20/31
61%19/31
Match Corners > 9.560%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

58%18/31
52%16/31
Match Corners > 10.552%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

52%16/31

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 31/3131/313131
2.10
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.00
10%3/31
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

6%2/31
14.52
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.06
69%18/26
Match Cards > 3.574%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

79%22/28
26/3128/31
50%13/26
Match Cards > 4.552%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

54%15/28
26/3128/31
63%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

64%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeLaval at home · Rodez on the road
1515
0.67
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.53
7%1/15
Win Rate23%

Share of sampled matches won.

40%6/15
47%7/15
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

27%4/15
1.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.40
1.60
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.47
7%1/15
Clean Sheet10%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%2/15
53%8/15
BTTS63%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

73%11/15
47%7/15
Over 2.553%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

60%9/15
1.50
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.80
1.97
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.59