Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 29·04/04/2026·06:00 PM
Nancy
Nancy
DLLDD
1-1
Finished
HT1-0
Saint Etienne
Saint Etienne
WDWWW
📍 Stade Marcel Picot, Nancy
Season statsLigue 2
Nancy28matchesEtienne28matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
34%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

80%
1455
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1560
40%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

71%
27%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

89%
2.40
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.21

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2828
1.00
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.89
25%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

57%
25%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

18%
50%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

25%
25%
Clean Sheet34%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

43%
46%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

21%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2828
0.86
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.79
54%
Scored > 0.566%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

79%
61%
Over 1.564%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

68%
50%
Over 2.554%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

57%
21%
Over 3.529%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

36%
43%
BTTS43%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

43%
14%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

21%
18%
Scored Both Halves27%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

36%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2828
1.43
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.04
11.18
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.39
4.14
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.61
2.81
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.61
27/28
66%
Save %69%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

72%
25%
Clean Sheet34%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

43%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2828
0.93
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.06
1.85
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.81
-0.91
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.25
-0.14
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.35
0.08
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.16

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2828
11.29
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.07
3.11
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.82
6.71
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.50
59%
Box Shot %62%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

65%
28%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

37%
8%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

14%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2828
43%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

60%
74%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

86%
342.75
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

566.11
-0.14
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.15

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2828
21%6/28
Leading at HT30%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

39%11/28
50%14/28
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

43%12/28
29%8/28
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

18%5/28
61%17/28
HT/FT Same Outcome59%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

57%16/28
83%5/6
Led at HT → Won87%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

91%10/11
13%1/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered26%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

40%2/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 28/2828/282828
22%
0-15'19%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

16%
22%
16-30'20%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

18%
13%
31-45'15%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

18%
13%
46-60'14%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

16%
4%
61-75'8%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

12%
26%
76-90+'24%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 28/2828/282828
38%9/24
Scored First50%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

62%16/26
63%15/24
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

38%10/26
56%5/9
Win when Scoring First75%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

94%15/16
13%2/15
Win when Conceding First12%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

10%1/10
21'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

32'
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

29'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 28/2828/282828
21%6/28
Scored after 75'27%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

32%9/28
32%9/28
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

18%5/28
86%6/7
Lead Saved after 75'87%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

88%14/16
14%1/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

13%2/16
0%0/28
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/28

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 28/2828/282828
87%20/23
Open-Play Share89%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

90%46/51
13%3/23
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

10%5/51
0%0/23
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/51
7%3/41
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

13%4/30
2%1/41
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/30

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2828
4.89
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.86
4.71
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.14
51%
Corner Share52%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

54%
0.21
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.55
68%19/28
Match Corners > 8.561%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

54%15/28
57%16/28
Match Corners > 9.545%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

32%9/28
39%11/28
Match Corners > 10.530%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

21%6/28

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 28/2828/282828
1.96
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.68
18%5/28
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

11%3/28
15.29
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.86
69%18/26
Match Cards > 3.571%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

73%19/26
26/2826/28
46%12/26
Match Cards > 4.546%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

46%12/26
26/2826/28
64%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

58%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeNancy at home · Etienne on the road
1414
1.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.71
29%4/14
Win Rate39%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%7/14
57%8/14
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

29%4/14
0.79
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.29
1.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.07
29%4/14
Clean Sheet36%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

43%6/14
29%4/14
BTTS32%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

36%5/14
43%6/14
Over 2.546%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%7/14
0.98
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.43
2.12
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.09