Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 27·03/14/2026·09:00
Reims
Reims
DLDDD
1-2
Finished
HT1-0
Rodez
Rodez
WDWWW
📍 Stade Auguste-Delaune, Reims
Season statsLigue 2
Reims26matchesRodez26matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
54%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

76%
1631
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1514
62%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

71%
46%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

81%
1.11
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.79

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2626
1.65
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.54
42%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

38%
38%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

38%
19%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

23%
50%
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%
27%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

19%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2626
1.46
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.23
73%
Scored > 0.577%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

81%
58%
Over 1.565%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

73%
42%
Over 2.544%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

46%
31%
Over 3.525%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

19%
46%
BTTS56%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

65%
15%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

23%
35%
Scored Both Halves29%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

23%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2626
0.92
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.19
9.81
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.04
2.85
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.77
1.96
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.58
69%
Save %72%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

75%
50%
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2626
1.32
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.59
0.74
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.16
0.58
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.42
-0.13
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.27
0.09
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.15

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2626
13.38
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.62
4.58
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.58
8.73
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.00
65%
Box Shot %66%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

66%
34%
On-Target %34%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
11%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2626
56%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

40%
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

75%
492.42
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

298.96
0.13
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.19

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2626
27%7/26
Leading at HT25%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

23%6/26
50%13/26
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

62%16/26
23%6/26
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

15%4/26
73%19/26
HT/FT Same Outcome63%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

54%14/26
100%7/7
Led at HT → Won83%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

67%4/6
33%2/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered42%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%2/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 26/2626/262626
14%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

12%
19%
16-30'20%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

21%
19%
31-45'12%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

6%
11%
46-60'11%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

12%
11%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

15%
27%
76-90+'30%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

33%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 26/2626/262626
45%9/20
Scored First50%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

54%13/24
55%11/20
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

46%11/24
89%8/9
Win when Scoring First68%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

46%6/13
27%3/11
Win when Conceding First32%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

36%4/11
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

37'
21'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

33'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 26/2626/262626
38%10/26
Scored after 75'35%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

31%8/26
12%3/26
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

19%5/26
83%10/12
Lead Saved after 75'85%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

86%6/7
17%2/12
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

14%1/7
0%0/26
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

4%1/26

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 26/2626/262626
92%34/37
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

97%32/33
5%2/37
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/33
3%1/37
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/33
4%1/25
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

10%3/31
8%2/25
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/31

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2626
5.42
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.46
2.92
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.81
65%
Corner Share54%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

43%
2.92
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.56
42%11/26
Match Corners > 8.554%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

65%17/26
23%6/26
Match Corners > 9.540%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

58%15/26
23%6/26
Match Corners > 10.537%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

50%13/26

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 26/2626/262626
2.12
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.96
8%2/26
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

8%2/26
14.12
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.35
67%16/24
Match Cards > 3.572%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

78%18/23
24/2623/26
58%14/24
Match Cards > 4.555%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

52%12/23
24/2623/26
59%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

60%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeReims at home · Rodez on the road
1213
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.46
58%7/12
Win Rate48%

Share of sampled matches won.

38%5/13
17%2/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

31%4/13
1.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.38
0.67
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.54
67%8/12
Clean Sheet41%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

15%2/13
33%4/12
BTTS51%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

69%9/13
42%5/12
Over 2.552%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

62%8/13
1.63
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.76
0.66
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.70