Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 26·03/06/2026·14:00
Rodez
Rodez
DWWWD
1-0
Finished
HT0-0
Grenoble
Grenoble
DDDDW
📍 Stade Paul-Lignon, Rodez
Season statsLigue 2
Rodez25matchesGrenoble25matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
76%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

57%
1572
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1532
69%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

55%
83%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

60%
2.17
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.21

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2525
1.48
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.16
36%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

24%
40%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

44%
24%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

32%
20%
Clean Sheet24%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

28%
20%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

36%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2525
1.24
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.96
80%
Scored > 0.572%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

64%
76%
Over 1.568%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

60%
48%
Over 2.544%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

40%
20%
Over 3.520%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

20%
68%
BTTS62%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%
24%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

16%
24%
Scored Both Halves18%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

12%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2525
1.24
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.16
14.44
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.52
4.88
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.40
3.64
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.50
24/25
75%
Save %75%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

76%
20%
Clean Sheet24%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

28%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2525
1.64
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.02
1.29
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.22
0.36
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.20
-0.27
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.12
0.16
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.10

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2525
10.56
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.76
3.56
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.80
7.04
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.08
67%
Box Shot %66%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

66%
34%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
12%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2525
40%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

45%
75%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

80%
297.68
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

368.04
-0.19
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.10

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2525
24%6/25
Leading at HT24%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

24%6/25
60%15/25
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

52%13/25
16%4/25
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

24%6/25
56%14/25
HT/FT Same Outcome60%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

64%16/25
67%4/6
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

83%5/6
50%2/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered50%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%3/6

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 25/2525/252525
13%
0-15'12%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

12%
22%
16-30'19%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

16%
6%
31-45'9%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

12%
13%
46-60'12%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

12%
16%
61-75'12%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

8%
31%
76-90+'36%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

40%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 25/2525/252525
52%12/23
Scored First48%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

43%9/21
48%11/23
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

57%12/21
42%5/12
Win when Scoring First54%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

67%6/9
36%4/11
Win when Conceding First18%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/12
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

28'
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

44'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 25/2525/252525
28%7/25
Scored after 75'32%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

36%9/25
20%5/25
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

24%6/25
86%6/7
Lead Saved after 75'76%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

67%4/6
14%1/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

33%2/6
4%1/25
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/25

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 25/2525/252525
97%31/32
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%23/25
0%0/32
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

4%1/25
3%1/32
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

4%1/25
10%3/31
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%2/29
0%0/31
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/29

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2525
4.36
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.96
6.00
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.96
42%
Corner Share41%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

40%
-1.12
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-2.42
68%17/25
Match Corners > 8.562%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

56%14/25
60%15/25
Match Corners > 9.558%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

56%14/25
52%13/25
Match Corners > 10.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

48%12/25

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 25/2525/252525
1.92
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.88
8%2/25
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

20%5/25
14.48
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.68
77%17/22
Match Cards > 3.574%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

70%14/20
22/2520/25
50%11/22
Match Cards > 4.548%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

45%9/20
22/2520/25
60%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

63%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeRodez at home · Grenoble on the road
1212
1.50
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.83
33%4/12
Win Rate25%

Share of sampled matches won.

17%2/12
17%2/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%6/12
1.08
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.17
0.92
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.50
25%3/12
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

8%1/12
67%8/12
BTTS67%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%8/12
33%4/12
Over 2.542%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%6/12
1.50
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.35
1.11
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.74