Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 26·03/09/2026·15:45
Dunkerque
Dunkerque
LDWDL
1-1
Finished
HT1-0
Reims
Reims
LDDDD
📍 Stade Marcel Tribut, Dunkerque
Season statsLigue 2
Dunkerque25matchesReims25matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
52%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

53%
1617
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1634
58%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

63%
45%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

42%
2.46
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

0.97

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2525
1.52
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.68
40%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

44%
32%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

36%
28%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%
24%
Clean Sheet38%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

52%
24%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

28%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2525
1.64
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.48
76%
Scored > 0.574%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

72%
72%
Over 1.564%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

56%
56%
Over 2.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

44%
32%
Over 3.532%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

32%
60%
BTTS52%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

44%
24%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

16%
44%
Scored Both Halves40%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

36%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2525
1.08
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.92
10.80
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

9.92
3.36
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

2.80
2.40
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

1.92
71%
Save %70%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

69%
24%
Clean Sheet38%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

52%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2525
1.79
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.33
1.20
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.69
0.59
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.64
-0.30
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.13
0.17
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.10

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2525
10.40
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.40
4.20
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.64
7.36
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.68
71%
Box Shot %68%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

65%
40%
On-Target %38%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
16%
Shot Conversion13%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

11%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2525
57%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

56%
86%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

84%
501.92
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

493.40
0.16
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.13

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2525
32%8/25
Leading at HT30%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

28%7/25
44%11/25
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

52%13/25
24%6/25
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

20%5/25
60%15/25
HT/FT Same Outcome68%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

76%19/25
75%6/8
Led at HT → Won88%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%7/7
33%2/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered27%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

20%1/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 25/2525/252525
14%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

14%
17%
16-30'18%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

19%
19%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

19%
24%
46-60'17%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

11%
19%
61-75'15%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

11%
7%
76-90+'16%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

25%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 25/2525/252525
61%14/23
Scored First54%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

47%9/19
39%9/23
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

53%10/19
57%8/14
Win when Scoring First73%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

89%8/9
22%2/9
Win when Conceding First26%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

30%3/10
26'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

36'
26'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

19'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 25/2525/252525
12%3/25
Scored after 75'24%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

36%9/25
24%6/25
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

12%3/25
83%10/12
Lead Saved after 75'83%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

83%10/12
17%2/12
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

17%2/12
0%0/25
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/25

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 25/2525/252525
90%38/42
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%33/36
5%2/42
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

6%2/36
5%2/42
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/36
8%2/26
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

4%1/24
4%1/26
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

8%2/24

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2525
4.36
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.48
4.68
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

2.88
48%
Corner Share57%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

66%
-0.29
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

3.19
64%16/25
Match Corners > 8.554%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

44%11/25
40%10/25
Match Corners > 9.532%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

24%6/25
24%6/25
Match Corners > 10.524%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

24%6/25

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 25/2525/252525
1.88
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.12
12%3/25
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

8%2/25
13.00
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.16
70%16/23
Match Cards > 3.567%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

65%15/23
23/2523/25
43%10/23
Match Cards > 4.552%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

61%14/23
23/2523/25
69%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

57%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeDunkerque at home · Reims on the road
1313
1.54
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.38
38%5/13
Win Rate35%

Share of sampled matches won.

31%4/13
23%3/13
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

23%3/13
1.69
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.46
1.08
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.15
31%4/13
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%5/13
54%7/13
BTTS54%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

54%7/13
46%6/13
Over 2.546%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

46%6/13
1.78
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.56
1.06
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.11