Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 25·02/28/2026·08:00
Guingamp
Guingamp
DLDLW
0-0
Finished
HT0-0
Rodez
Rodez
WWWDW
📍 Stade de Roudourou, Guingamp
Season statsLigue 2
Guingamp24matchesRodez24matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
52%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

77%
1506
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1514
52%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

67%
51%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

87%
2.15
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.51

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2424
1.42
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.50
38%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

38%
29%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

38%
33%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

25%
29%
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%
25%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

17%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2424
1.46
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.29
75%
Scored > 0.579%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

83%
75%
Over 1.577%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

79%
67%
Over 2.558%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%
38%
Over 3.529%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

21%
54%
BTTS63%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

71%
17%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

25%
21%
Scored Both Halves23%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

25%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2424
1.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.29
11.08
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.63
3.67
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.04
2.21
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.75
60%
Save %67%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

74%
29%
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2424
1.61
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.82
1.55
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.43
0.06
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.39
-0.23
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.33
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.18

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2424
11.75
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.58
4.04
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.63
7.83
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.13
67%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

67%
34%
On-Target %34%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
12%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2424
55%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

41%
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

75%
481.04
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

299.00
0.12
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.18

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2424
33%8/24
Leading at HT29%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

25%6/24
29%7/24
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

58%14/24
38%9/24
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

17%4/24
67%16/24
HT/FT Same Outcome60%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

54%13/24
75%6/8
Led at HT → Won71%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

67%4/6
22%2/9
Trailed at HT → Recovered36%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%2/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 24/2424/242424
19%
0-15'16%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
22%
16-30'22%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

22%
11%
31-45'9%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

6%
14%
46-60'13%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
14%
61-75'15%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

16%
22%
76-90+'26%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

31%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 24/2424/242424
59%13/22
Scored First56%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

52%12/23
41%9/22
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

48%11/23
62%8/13
Win when Scoring First52%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

42%5/12
11%1/9
Win when Conceding First24%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

36%4/11
24'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

33'
24'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

33'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 24/2424/242424
25%6/24
Scored after 75'27%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

29%7/24
29%7/24
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

21%5/24
82%9/11
Lead Saved after 75'84%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

86%6/7
18%2/11
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

14%1/7
0%0/24
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

4%1/24

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 24/2424/242424
95%35/37
Open-Play Share96%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

97%31/32
3%1/37
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/32
3%1/37
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/32
11%4/36
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

10%3/31
0%0/36
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/31

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2424
5.38
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.29
3.67
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

6.04
59%
Corner Share50%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

42%
1.94
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.33
54%13/24
Match Corners > 8.560%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

67%16/24
29%7/24
Match Corners > 9.544%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

58%14/24
25%6/24
Match Corners > 10.538%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

50%12/24

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 24/2424/242424
1.96
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.88
13%3/24
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

8%2/24
11.71
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.38
86%19/22
Match Cards > 3.582%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

77%17/22
22/2422/24
59%13/22
Match Cards > 4.552%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

45%10/22
22/2422/24
69%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

60%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGuingamp at home · Rodez on the road
1212
1.50
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.50
42%5/12
Win Rate42%

Share of sampled matches won.

42%5/12
33%4/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%4/12
1.42
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.50
1.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.67
33%4/12
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

8%1/12
42%5/12
BTTS58%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

75%9/12
67%8/12
Over 2.567%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%8/12
1.77
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.97
1.62
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.96