Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 20·01/23/2026·14:00
Amiens
Amiens
LWLWW
0-0
Finished
HT0-0
Laval
Laval
LWLWL
📍 Stade de la Licorne, Amiens
Season statsLigue 2
Amiens19matchesLaval19matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
49%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

42%
1516
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1505
52%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

49%
45%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

34%
2.98
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.98

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1919
0.95
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.79
26%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

16%
16%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

32%
58%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

53%
16%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

21%
32%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

53%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1919
1.16
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.74
68%
Scored > 0.558%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

47%
68%
Over 1.568%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

68%
58%
Over 2.545%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

32%
26%
Over 3.521%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

16%
58%
BTTS47%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

37%
16%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

5%
21%
Scored Both Halves16%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

11%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1919
1.58
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.47
15.95
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.00
4.74
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.00
3.00
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.74
63%
Save %66%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

68%
16%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

21%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1919
1.92
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.59
1.70
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.59
0.21
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.00
-0.35
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.29
0.21
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.18

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1919
8.74
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

8.74
3.47
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.26
5.58
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

5.32
64%
Box Shot %62%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

61%
40%
On-Target %39%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

37%
13%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

8%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1919
46%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

47%
80%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

78%
386.00
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

408.79
-0.08
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.10

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1919
32%6/19
Leading at HT24%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

16%3/19
32%6/19
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

47%9/19
37%7/19
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

37%7/19
63%12/19
HT/FT Same Outcome63%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

63%12/19
67%4/6
Led at HT → Won83%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%3/3
14%1/7
Trailed at HT → Recovered21%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

29%2/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 19/1919/191919
5%
0-15'6%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

6%
26%
16-30'26%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

25%
0%
31-45'16%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

31%
26%
46-60'26%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

25%
16%
61-75'8%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

0%
26%
76-90+'19%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

13%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 19/1919/191919
39%7/18
Scored First40%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

41%7/17
61%11/18
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

59%10/17
43%3/7
Win when Scoring First43%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

43%3/7
18%2/11
Win when Conceding First9%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/10
25'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

27'
29'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

40'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 19/1919/191919
26%5/19
Scored after 75'18%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

11%2/19
42%8/19
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

32%6/19
60%3/5
Lead Saved after 75'60%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

60%3/5
40%2/5
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

40%2/5
5%1/19
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/19

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 19/1919/191919
100%19/19
Open-Play Share81%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

63%10/16
0%0/19
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

19%3/16
0%0/19
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

19%3/16
15%5/33
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

8%2/26
9%3/33
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

4%1/26

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1919
4.26
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.89
6.16
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.37
41%
Corner Share44%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

48%
-2.25
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.06
68%13/19
Match Corners > 8.568%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

68%13/19
58%11/19
Match Corners > 9.555%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

53%10/19
53%10/19
Match Corners > 10.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

47%9/19

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 19/1919/191919
2.05
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.00
5%1/19
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

16%3/19
12.74
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

15.26
88%14/16
Match Cards > 3.584%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

80%12/15
16/1915/19
56%9/16
Match Cards > 4.558%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

60%9/15
16/1915/19
67%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

61%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeAmiens at home · Laval on the road
910
0.56
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.20
11%1/9
Win Rate21%

Share of sampled matches won.

30%3/10
67%6/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%4/10
0.89
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.90
1.44
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.40
11%1/9
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%3/10
56%5/9
BTTS48%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%4/10
56%5/9
Over 2.543%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

30%3/10
1.48
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.61
1.87
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.49