Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 16·12/05/2025·14:00
Grenoble
Grenoble
WLWWW
1-0
Finished
HT0-0
Nancy
Nancy
WLWLL
📍 Stade des Alpes, Grenoble
Season statsLigue 2
Grenoble15matchesNancy15matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
64%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

53%
1489
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1466
59%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

44%
68%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

62%
2.98
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.46

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1515
1.13
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.00
27%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

27%
33%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

20%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

53%
20%
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%
27%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

47%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1515
1.13
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.93
73%
Scored > 0.563%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

53%
67%
Over 1.563%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

60%
47%
Over 2.547%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

47%
27%
Over 3.527%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

27%
67%
BTTS53%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%
20%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

13%
13%
Scored Both Halves17%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

20%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1515
1.33
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.40
13.80
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.60
5.07
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.40
3.93
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.07
78%
Save %74%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
20%
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1515
1.77
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.00
1.54
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.76
0.23
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.23
-0.33
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.38
0.17
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.18

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1515
10.33
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.27
3.80
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.07
6.53
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.67
63%
Box Shot %61%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

59%
37%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

27%
11%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

8%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1515
44%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

44%
80%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

74%
365.40
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

340.27
-0.12
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.12

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1515
33%5/15
Leading at HT30%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

27%4/15
53%8/15
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

47%7/15
13%2/15
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

27%4/15
60%9/15
HT/FT Same Outcome60%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

60%9/15
80%4/5
Led at HT → Won78%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

75%3/4
50%1/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered25%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 15/1515/151515
17%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

14%
17%
16-30'23%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

29%
17%
31-45'15%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

14%
11%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

21%
11%
61-75'6%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

0%
28%
76-90+'25%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

21%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 15/1515/151515
50%7/14
Scored First43%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

36%5/14
50%7/14
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

64%9/14
57%4/7
Win when Scoring First49%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

40%2/5
0%0/7
Win when Conceding First11%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

22%2/9
26'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

25'
44'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

33'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 15/1515/151515
33%5/15
Scored after 75'27%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

20%3/15
33%5/15
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

27%4/15
60%3/5
Lead Saved after 75'68%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

75%3/4
40%2/5
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

25%1/4
0%0/15
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/15

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 15/1515/151515
89%16/18
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

93%13/14
6%1/18
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

7%1/14
6%1/18
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/14
5%1/20
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

14%3/21
0%0/20
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/21

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1515
3.87
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.93
5.87
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.47
40%
Corner Share46%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

52%
-2.10
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.09
60%9/15
Match Corners > 8.560%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

60%9/15
60%9/15
Match Corners > 9.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

53%8/15
47%7/15
Match Corners > 10.540%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

33%5/15

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 15/1515/151515
1.80
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.13
13%2/15
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

20%3/15
14.47
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

16.20
73%8/11
Match Cards > 3.572%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

71%10/14
11/1514/15
55%6/11
Match Cards > 4.552%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

50%7/14
11/1514/15
67%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

64%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGrenoble at home · Nancy on the road
78
1.43
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
29%2/7
Win Rate27%

Share of sampled matches won.

25%2/8
14%1/7
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%4/8
0.86
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.13
0.86
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.75
43%3/7
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%1/8
57%4/7
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

63%5/8
29%2/7
Over 2.552%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%6/8
1.33
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.03
1.23
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.28