Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 15·11/22/2025·08:00
Amiens
Amiens
WLLLW
1-2
Finished
HT1-2
Guingamp
Guingamp
WDWDL
📍 Stade de la Licorne, Amiens
Season statsLigue 2
Amiens14matchesGuingamp14matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
46%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

65%
1516
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1567
44%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

60%
47%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

70%
3.23
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.88

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1414
1.07
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.43
29%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

36%
21%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

36%
50%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

29%
21%
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

21%
29%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

29%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1414
1.29
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.57
71%
Scored > 0.571%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

71%
64%
Over 1.568%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

71%
57%
Over 2.561%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

64%
36%
Over 3.546%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

57%
57%
BTTS57%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

57%
14%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

21%
21%
Scored Both Halves25%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

29%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1414
1.57
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.71
16.93
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.79
5.07
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.71
3.29
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.07
65%
Save %60%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

56%
21%
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

21%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1414
1.71
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.92
1.84
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.74
-0.13
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.18
-0.33
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.32
0.19
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.16

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1414
8.21
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.93
3.21
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.21
5.29
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.93
64%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

63%
39%
On-Target %39%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

39%
16%
Shot Conversion15%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

14%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1414
45%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

53%
80%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

84%
376.71
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

476.29
-0.11
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.09

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1414
36%5/14
Leading at HT39%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

43%6/14
36%5/14
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

29%4/14
29%4/14
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

29%4/14
57%8/14
HT/FT Same Outcome61%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

64%9/14
60%3/5
Led at HT → Won63%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

67%4/6
25%1/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered25%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

25%1/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 14/1414/141414
7%
0-15'16%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

26%
20%
16-30'19%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

17%
0%
31-45'7%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

13%
33%
46-60'21%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

9%
13%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

13%
27%
76-90+'24%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 14/1414/141414
38%5/13
Scored First50%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

62%8/13
62%8/13
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

38%5/13
40%2/5
Win when Scoring First51%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

63%5/8
25%2/8
Win when Conceding First13%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/5
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

16'
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

30'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 14/1414/141414
29%4/14
Scored after 75'29%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

29%4/14
50%7/14
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

43%6/14
60%3/5
Lead Saved after 75'66%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

71%5/7
40%2/5
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

29%2/7
7%1/14
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/14

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 14/1414/141414
100%15/15
Open-Play Share98%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

96%22/23
0%0/15
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/23
0%0/15
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

4%1/23
12%3/25
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

4%1/24
12%3/25
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/24

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1414
3.79
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.71
6.14
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.36
38%
Corner Share48%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

58%
-2.71
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.87
57%8/14
Match Corners > 8.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

43%6/14
50%7/14
Match Corners > 9.536%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

21%3/14
50%7/14
Match Corners > 10.532%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

14%2/14

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 14/1414/141414
2.21
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.64
7%1/14
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/14
13.14
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.64
77%10/13
Match Cards > 3.577%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

77%10/13
13/1413/14
46%6/13
Match Cards > 4.554%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

62%8/13
13/1413/14
69%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

67%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeAmiens at home · Guingamp on the road
76
0.71
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.33
14%1/7
Win Rate24%

Share of sampled matches won.

33%2/6
57%4/7
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%2/6
0.86
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.67
1.29
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.83
14%1/7
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%1/6
43%3/7
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%4/6
43%3/7
Over 2.555%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%4/6
1.50
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.94
1.76
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.88