Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 10·10/17/2025·14:00
Grenoble
Grenoble
WDLLW
1-1
Finished
HT0-0
PAU
PAU
WWWWL
📍 Stade des Alpes, Grenoble
Season statsLigue 2
Grenoble9matchesPAU9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
49%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

76%
1424
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1489
42%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

68%
55%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

84%
2.26
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.76

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
99
1.00
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.22
22%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

67%
33%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

22%
44%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

11%
22%
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

44%
22%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

11%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
99
1.11
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.78
78%
Scored > 0.583%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

89%
67%
Over 1.578%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

89%
44%
Over 2.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

56%
22%
Over 3.522%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

22%
67%
BTTS56%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

44%
11%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

22%
11%
Scored Both Halves22%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

33%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
99
1.33
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.89
12.56
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

9.33
5.00
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

2.89
3.89
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.00
78%
Save %74%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

69%
22%
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

44%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
99
1.54
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.92
1.67
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.60
-0.13
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.32
-0.27
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.39
0.16
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.15

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
99
9.22
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

12.33
2.67
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.89
5.78
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.89
63%
Box Shot %63%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

64%
29%
On-Target %30%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

32%
12%
Shot Conversion13%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

14%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
99
43%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

51%
79%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

85%
357.89
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

427.00
-0.14
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.01

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
99
22%2/9
Leading at HT33%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

44%4/9
56%5/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

22%2/9
22%2/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%3/9
56%5/9
HT/FT Same Outcome56%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

56%5/9
100%2/2
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%4/4
50%1/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered58%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

67%2/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/99/999
18%
0-15'19%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

20%
9%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

20%
9%
31-45'18%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

27%
9%
46-60'11%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
18%
61-75'9%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

0%
36%
76-90+'28%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

20%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/99/999
33%3/9
Scored First44%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

56%5/9
67%6/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

44%4/9
67%2/3
Win when Scoring First83%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%5/5
0%0/6
Win when Conceding First13%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

25%1/4
23'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

19'
40'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

17'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/99/999
44%4/9
Scored after 75'39%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

33%3/9
33%3/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

22%2/9
67%2/3
Lead Saved after 75'83%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%5/5
33%1/3
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/5
0%0/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/99/999
91%10/11
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

93%14/15
0%0/11
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

7%1/15
9%1/11
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/15
0%0/12
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%1/9
0%0/12
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

11%1/9

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
99
3.56
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.00
5.78
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.22
38%
Corner Share44%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

49%
-2.37
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.16
56%5/9
Match Corners > 8.561%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

67%6/9
56%5/9
Match Corners > 9.556%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

56%5/9
33%3/9
Match Corners > 10.539%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

44%4/9

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/99/999
1.33
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.00
22%2/9
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

22%2/9
13.44
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

9.89
100%5/5
Match Cards > 3.594%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

88%7/8
5/98/9
60%3/5
Match Cards > 4.555%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

50%4/8
5/98/9
52%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

49%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGrenoble at home · PAU on the road
44
1.25
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.00
25%1/4
Win Rate38%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%2/4
25%1/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%0/4
0.75
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.00
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
50%2/4
Clean Sheet38%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%1/4
50%2/4
BTTS63%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

75%3/4
25%1/4
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%3/4
1.32
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.85
1.35
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.00