Ligue 1·
Regular Season - 26·03/14/2026·12:00
Lorient
Lorient
DDDDW
2-1
Finished
HT1-0
Lens
Lens
WDDLW
📍 Stade du Moustoir, Lorient
Season statsLigue 1
Lorient25matchesLens25matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 1.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
52%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

74%
1716
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1877
64%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

74%
40%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

74%
2.50
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.57

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2525
1.36
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.24
32%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

72%
40%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

8%
28%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%
20%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%
28%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

16%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2525
1.40
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.92
72%
Scored > 0.578%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

84%
88%
Over 1.584%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

80%
44%
Over 2.554%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

64%
36%
Over 3.530%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

24%
56%
BTTS52%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

48%
16%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

36%
32%
Scored Both Halves42%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

52%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2525
1.56
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.84
10.48
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.28
3.80
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.44
2.20
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.67
24/25
58%
Save %66%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

74%
20%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2525
1.23
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.02
1.30
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.06
-0.07
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.97
0.27
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.02
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2525
11.76
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

14.92
3.92
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.20
7.52
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

10.68
64%
Box Shot %68%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

72%
33%
On-Target %34%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
12%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2525
45%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

49%
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

84%
430.24
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

449.88
-0.07
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.00

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2525
40%10/25
Leading at HT42%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

44%11/25
32%8/25
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

36%9/25
28%7/25
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

20%5/25
60%15/25
HT/FT Same Outcome58%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

56%14/25
70%7/10
Led at HT → Won80%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

91%10/11
43%3/7
Trailed at HT → Recovered41%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

40%2/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 25/2525/252525
11%
0-15'11%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

11%
8%
16-30'9%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

11%
25%
31-45'23%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
14%
46-60'18%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

21%
17%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

11%
25%
76-90+'25%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

26%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 25/2525/252525
46%11/24
Scored First56%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

67%16/24
54%13/24
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

33%8/24
73%8/11
Win when Scoring First83%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

94%15/16
0%0/13
Win when Conceding First19%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

38%3/8
29'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

31'
32'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

27'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 25/2525/252525
28%7/25
Scored after 75'30%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

32%8/25
32%8/25
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

12%3/25
88%7/8
Lead Saved after 75'94%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%14/14
13%1/8
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/14
0%0/25
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/25

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 25/2525/252525
89%32/36
Open-Play Share90%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

91%43/47
6%2/36
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

9%4/47
6%2/36
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/47
11%4/38
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

9%2/23
3%1/38
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

4%1/23

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2525
3.28
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.68
5.12
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.00
39%
Corner Share49%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

59%
-1.85
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.94
40%10/25
Match Corners > 8.548%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

56%14/25
40%10/25
Match Corners > 9.544%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

48%12/25
20%5/25
Match Corners > 10.526%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

32%8/25

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 25/2525/252525
1.68
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.92
4%1/25
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

16%4/25
9.84
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.40
76%13/17
Match Cards > 3.577%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

77%17/22
17/2522/25
53%9/17
Match Cards > 4.558%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

64%14/22
17/2522/25
56%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

66%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeLorient at home · Lens on the road
1212
1.92
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.92
50%6/12
Win Rate54%

Share of sampled matches won.

58%7/12
8%1/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

25%3/12
2.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.83
1.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.08
25%3/12
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%3/12
75%9/12
BTTS67%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

58%7/12
58%7/12
Over 2.563%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%8/12
1.48
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.76
1.06
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.28