Ligue 1·
Regular Season - 24·02/28/2026·13:00
Monaco
Monaco
DWLWD
2-0
Finished
HT0-0
Angers
Angers
LLWWD
📍 Stade Louis II, Monaco
Season statsLigue 1
Monaco23matchesAngers23matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 1.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
56%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

43%
1645
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1584
55%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

48%
57%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

38%
3.83
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.73

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2323
1.48
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.26
43%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

35%
17%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

22%
39%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

43%
22%
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

35%
26%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

35%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2323
1.65
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.96
74%
Scored > 0.570%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

65%
65%
Over 1.561%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

57%
61%
Over 2.543%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

26%
57%
Over 3.537%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

17%
61%
BTTS48%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

35%
30%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

4%
30%
Scored Both Halves24%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

17%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2323
1.57
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.22
13.35
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.83
4.43
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.00
2.74
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.74
62%
Save %68%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

75%
22%
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

35%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2323
1.55
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

0.87
1.34
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.49
0.21
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.62
0.04
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.05
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.09

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2323
12.26
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9.35
4.22
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.48
9.09
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

5.61
74%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

60%
34%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

37%
13%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2323
53%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

43%
83%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

82%
466.39
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

416.91
0.03
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.11

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2323
26%6/23
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

30%7/23
48%11/23
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

26%6/23
26%6/23
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

43%10/23
57%13/23
HT/FT Same Outcome63%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

70%16/23
100%6/6
Led at HT → Won93%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

86%6/7
33%2/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered27%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

20%2/10

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 23/2323/232323
8%
0-15'6%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

5%
11%
16-30'17%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

24%
16%
31-45'13%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

10%
16%
46-60'18%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

19%
24%
61-75'12%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

0%
24%
76-90+'34%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

43%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 23/2323/232323
38%8/21
Scored First37%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

36%8/22
62%13/21
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

64%14/22
88%7/8
Win when Scoring First88%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

88%7/8
23%3/13
Win when Conceding First15%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

7%1/14
32'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
40'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

39'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 23/2323/232323
35%8/23
Scored after 75'35%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

35%8/23
43%10/23
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

13%3/23
89%8/9
Lead Saved after 75'94%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%6/6
11%1/9
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/6
0%0/23
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/23

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 23/2323/232323
86%32/37
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

95%20/21
11%4/37
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

5%1/21
3%1/37
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/21
11%4/37
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%2/29
5%2/37
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/29

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2323
4.83
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.52
4.39
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.17
52%
Corner Share46%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

41%
0.66
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.41
65%15/23
Match Corners > 8.554%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

43%10/23
43%10/23
Match Corners > 9.541%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

39%9/23
35%8/23
Match Corners > 10.533%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

30%7/23

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 23/2323/232323
2.39
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.43
26%6/23
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

4%1/23
13.35
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.09
74%14/19
Match Cards > 3.561%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

47%9/19
19/2319/23
58%11/19
Match Cards > 4.534%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

11%2/19
19/2319/23
65%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

61%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeMonaco at home · Angers on the road
1211
1.83
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.82
58%7/12
Win Rate38%

Share of sampled matches won.

18%2/11
33%4/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

55%6/11
2.08
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.55
1.58
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.36
25%3/12
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%3/11
67%8/12
BTTS47%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

27%3/11
75%9/12
Over 2.551%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

27%3/11
1.78
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.65
1.23
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.77