Ligue 1·
Regular Season - 23·02/21/2026·11:00
Lens
Lens
WWWWL
2-3
Finished
HT1-0
Monaco
Monaco
LWDLW
📍 Stade Bollaert-Delelis, Lens
Season statsLigue 1
Lens22matchesMonaco22matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 1.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
86%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

54%
1877
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1645
84%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

50%
87%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

57%
3.71
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.03

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2222
2.36
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.41
77%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

41%
5%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

18%
18%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

41%
41%
Clean Sheet32%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%
18%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

27%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2222
1.91
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.59
82%
Scored > 0.577%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

73%
77%
Over 1.570%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

64%
64%
Over 2.561%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

59%
23%
Over 3.539%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

55%
45%
BTTS52%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

59%
41%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

27%
50%
Scored Both Halves41%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

32%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2222
0.77
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.55
11.77
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.14
3.45
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.32
2.76
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.64
21/22
76%
Save %69%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

61%
41%
Clean Sheet32%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2222
2.39
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.56
1.15
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.61
1.24
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.05
-0.08
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.13
0.16
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2222
13.91
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

12.36
5.05
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.18
10.09
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.23
73%
Box Shot %74%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

75%
36%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
14%
Shot Conversion13%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2222
49%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

53%
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

83%
450.14
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

468.41
0.05
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.04

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2222
41%9/22
Leading at HT34%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

27%6/22
41%9/22
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

50%11/22
18%4/22
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

23%5/22
59%13/22
HT/FT Same Outcome59%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

59%13/22
100%9/9
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%6/6
25%1/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered23%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

20%1/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 22/2222/222222
10%
0-15'9%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

9%
12%
16-30'12%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

12%
22%
31-45'20%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

18%
17%
46-60'17%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

18%
10%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

18%
29%
76-90+'28%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

26%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 22/2222/222222
67%14/21
Scored First53%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

40%8/20
33%7/21
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

60%12/20
100%14/14
Win when Scoring First94%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

88%7/8
43%3/7
Win when Conceding First30%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

17%2/12
32'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

32'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

43'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 22/2222/222222
36%8/22
Scored after 75'36%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

36%8/22
14%3/22
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

45%10/22
100%13/13
Lead Saved after 75'94%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

88%7/8
0%0/13
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

13%1/8
0%0/22
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/22

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 22/2222/222222
90%37/41
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

85%29/34
10%4/41
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

12%4/34
0%0/41
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/34
11%2/19
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%4/35
5%1/19
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

6%2/35

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2222
5.50
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.95
4.18
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.27
57%
Corner Share55%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

54%
1.66
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.06
50%11/22
Match Corners > 8.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

64%14/22
45%10/22
Match Corners > 9.545%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

45%10/22
36%8/22
Match Corners > 10.536%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

36%8/22

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 22/2222/222222
2.00
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.45
18%4/22
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

27%6/22
13.77
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.41
80%16/20
Match Cards > 3.579%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

78%14/18
20/2218/22
65%13/20
Match Cards > 4.563%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

61%11/18
20/2218/22
66%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

64%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeLens at home · Monaco on the road
1110
2.73
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.90
91%10/11
Win Rate55%

Share of sampled matches won.

20%2/10
9%1/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%5/10
1.91
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
0.45
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.50
55%6/11
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%2/10
36%4/11
BTTS43%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%5/10
55%6/11
Over 2.547%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

40%4/10
2.17
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.58
1.05
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.83